Abstract
It has been widely acknowledged that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), has since it came into existence, had an unsteady start. Part of the problem relates to its relation and communication with its criminal justice partners, by which we mean courts, police and local and central government. A key issue in this respect appears to be striking a balance between independence and autonomy on the one hand, and close contact and the establishment of 'partnership' on the other hand. This paper examines how this balance is struck in the Netherlands, where the Prosecution service (Openbaar Ministerie) is strikingly different in nature, but faces very similar problems. It will be argued that a slightly more relaxed attitude on the CPS's independence might open the door to more fruitful relationship with the criminal justice partners in the field. Several examples concerning this in the Netherlands will be presented and discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 261-274 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Liverpool Law Review |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The positioning of the prosecution service in the Netherlands and England and Wales: Lessons from one extreme to another'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver