TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of behavioral ecotoxicology in environmental protection
AU - Ford, Alex
AU - Ågerstrand, Marlene
AU - Brooks, Bryan W.
AU - Allen, Joel
AU - Bertram, Michael G.
AU - Brodin, Tomas
AU - Dang, Zhi-Chao
AU - Duquesne, Sabine
AU - Gergs, René
AU - Hoffmann, Frauke
AU - Hollert, Henner
AU - Jacob, Stefanie
AU - Klüver, Nils
AU - Lazorchak, Jim
AU - Ledesma, Mariana
AU - Melvin, Steven D.
AU - Mohr, Silvia
AU - Padilla, Stephanie
AU - Pyle, Gregory
AU - Scholz, Stefan
AU - Saaristo, Minna
AU - Smit, Els
AU - Steevens, Jeffery A.
AU - van den Berg, Sanne
AU - Kloas, Werner
AU - Wong, Bob B.M.
AU - Ziegler, Michael
AU - Maack, Gerd
PY - 2021/5/4
Y1 - 2021/5/4
N2 - For decades, we have known that chemicals affect human and wildlife behaviors. Moreover, due to recent technological and computational advances, scientists are now increasingly aware that a wide variety of contaminants and other environmental stressors adversely affect organismal behavior and subsequent ecological outcomes in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. There is also a groundswell of concern that regulatory ecotoxicology does not adequately consider behavior, primarily due to a lack of standardized toxicity methods. This has, in turn, led to the exclusion of many behavioral ecotoxicology studies from chemical risk assessments. To improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities for behavioral ecotoxicology within regulatory toxicology/risk assessment, a unique workshop with international representatives from the fields of behavioral ecology, ecotoxicology, regulatory (eco)toxicology, neurotoxicology, test standardization, and risk assessment resulted in the formation of consensus perspectives and recommendations, which promise to serve as a roadmap to advance interfaces among the basic and translational sciences, and regulatory practices
AB - For decades, we have known that chemicals affect human and wildlife behaviors. Moreover, due to recent technological and computational advances, scientists are now increasingly aware that a wide variety of contaminants and other environmental stressors adversely affect organismal behavior and subsequent ecological outcomes in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. There is also a groundswell of concern that regulatory ecotoxicology does not adequately consider behavior, primarily due to a lack of standardized toxicity methods. This has, in turn, led to the exclusion of many behavioral ecotoxicology studies from chemical risk assessments. To improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities for behavioral ecotoxicology within regulatory toxicology/risk assessment, a unique workshop with international representatives from the fields of behavioral ecology, ecotoxicology, regulatory (eco)toxicology, neurotoxicology, test standardization, and risk assessment resulted in the formation of consensus perspectives and recommendations, which promise to serve as a roadmap to advance interfaces among the basic and translational sciences, and regulatory practices
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.0c06493
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.0c06493
M3 - Article
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 55
SP - 5620
EP - 5628
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 9
ER -