The value of in-person banking: evidence from U.S. small businesses

Song Zhang, Liang Han, Konstantinos Kallias, Antonios Kallias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We produce the first systematic study of the determinants and implications of in-person banking. Using survey data from the U.S., we show that firms which are informationally opaque or operate in rural areas are liable to contact their primary bank in-person. This tendency extends to older, less educated, and female business owners. We find that a relationship based on face-to-face communication, on average, lasts 17.88 months longer, spans a wider range of financial services, and is more likely to be exclusive. The associated loans mature 3.37 months later and bear interest rates which are 11 basis points lower. For good quality firms, in-person communication also relates to less discouraged borrowing. These results are robust to multiple approaches for endogeneity, including recursive bivariate probits, treatment effect models, and instrumental variables regressions. Overall, our findings offer empirical grounding to soft information theory and a note of caution to banks against suppressing channels of interpersonal communication.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Publication statusAccepted for publication - 23 Feb 2021


  • Small business
  • Relationship banking
  • Soft information
  • In-person communication


Dive into the research topics of 'The value of in-person banking: evidence from U.S. small businesses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this