Abstract
This paper is a response to a commentary on a theoretical contribution to the debate on sustainable tourism development (Annals of Tourism Research (1999) 26 98-109). The main errors and serious misunderstandings evident in the commentary are highlighted. It is argued that there is little merit or validity in any of the stylistic or content related points in the commentary, though there are many other aspects of the argument unfolded in the paper which are wide open to more detailed scrutiny and valid contention.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 809-811 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Annals of Tourism Research |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2001 |