Abstract
Our performance varies throughout the day as a function of alignment with our circadian rhythms. The current experiment tested whether similar performance patterns can be observed in eyewitness memory performance. One-hundred-and-three morning-type and evening-type participants watched a stimulus event, provided a free report and answered cued questions in the morning and the evening hours, respectively. We expected eyewitness reports to be more detailed and more accurate at participants’ circadian peaks than at circadian troughs. Contrary to our predictions, time of testing did not significantly affect quantity and accuracy of eyewitness statements. Future studies might investigate whether matching chronotype with time of day would be beneficial when encoding or retrieval conditions are suboptimal or when eyewitnesses are vulnerable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 718-730 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 9 Mar 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2022 |
Keywords
- body clock
- chronotype
- circadian rhythm
- cued recall
- eyewitness memory
- free recall
- synchrony effect
- time of day