To veil or not to veil: detecting lies in the courtroom. A comment on Leach et al. (2016)

Vincent Denault, Louise Marie Jupe, Olivier Dodier, Nicolas Rochat

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    204 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    For the past 40 years, lie detection has predominantly been studied in the context of police-suspect and investigative interviews. In their paper, Leach et al. 2016 examined whether niqabs or hijabs interfere with the trial judges’ ability to detect deception and concluded that veiling enhanced trial judges’ ability to make accurate veracity judgments. In this comment, we argue that the conclusions made by Leach et al. are based upon an inaccurate experimental court paradigm and suffer from methodological and analytical issues. It is our opinion that the applicability of their research findings to real-life court proceedings alongside potential changes to court practices and policies based on Leach et al. should be regarded as naïve and misinformed.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
    Early online date9 Jan 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusEarly online - 9 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • courtroom
    • credibility assessment
    • cross-examination
    • deception detection
    • lie detection
    • niqab
    • trial

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To veil or not to veil: detecting lies in the courtroom. A comment on Leach et al. (2016)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this