Toward a Science of Silence: The Consequences of Leaving a Memory Unsaid

C. B. Stone, A. Coman, A. D. Brown, J. Koppel, W. Hirst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Silence about the past permeates acts of remembering, with marked mnemonic consequences. Mnemonic silence—the absence of expressing a memory—is public in nature and is embedded within communicative acts, such as conversations. As such, silence has the potential to affect both speakers—the source of the silence—and listeners—those attending to the speaker. Although the topic of silence is widely discussed, it is rarely mentioned in the empirical literature on memory. Three factors are employed to classify silence into different types: whether a silence is accompanied by covert remembering, whether the silence is intentional or unintentional, and whether the silenced memory is related or unrelated to the memories emerging in a conversation. These factors appear to be critical when considering the mnemonic consequences. Moreover, the influence of silence on memory varies between speaker and listener. Although rarely mentioned, recent empirical research on memory clearly has a bearing on a topic of such general interest as silence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-53
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a Science of Silence: The Consequences of Leaving a Memory Unsaid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this