Abstract
An analysis of Twitter use in 116 conferences suggests that the service is used
more extensively at PACS10 conferences (those devoted to the physics of
elementary particles and fields) and PACS90 conferences (those devoted to
geophysics, astronomy, and astrophysics) than at conferences in other fields of
physics. Furthermore, Twitter is used in a qualitatively different manner. A
possible reason for these differences is discussed.
more extensively at PACS10 conferences (those devoted to the physics of
elementary particles and fields) and PACS90 conferences (those devoted to
geophysics, astronomy, and astrophysics) than at conferences in other fields of
physics. Furthermore, Twitter is used in a qualitatively different manner. A
possible reason for these differences is discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1267-1286 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Scientometrics |
Volume | 108 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 27 Jun 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2016 |
Keywords
- scholarly communication
- subdisciplinary differences
- physics conference activity