Activities per year
Abstract
This paper proposes a new five-dimensional agenda for UK international development policy, offering an alternative to the current approach. The agenda is based on a critical evaluation of UK development policy since 1997 and incorporates insights from the ‘post-aid’ discourse. Key recommendations include:
Recognition of complexity: The UK must acknowledge the complex and contested nature of global development and the inherent limits of development policies and aid interventions.
Re-evaluation of private-sector aid instruments: A temporary pause in the use of private-sector mechanisms as a channel for overseas development assistance is advised, given concerns about their effectiveness in driving sustainable outcomes.
Consolidation of aid priorities: The UK should streamline its efforts, focusing on areas that demonstrate clear contributions to long-term sustainability and positive development outcomes.
Adoption of partnership models: A shift towards peer-to-peer learning and equal partnerships with global South countries is recommended, to foster equitable and respectful relationships.
Mitigation of negative impacts and improvement of policy coherence: The UK must address the unintended negative consequences of its development interventions and ensure coherence in policy-making across all government departments to enhance development outcomes.
This agenda is informed by extensive research, including thematic analysis of policy documents, semi-structured interviews with civil servants and development experts, and a detailed evaluation of 186 UK-funded projects over a 23-year period.
The proposed framework seeks to build more respectful and equal partnerships with governments and communities in the global South, enhancing support for vulnerable populations and reducing poverty. This approach is also expected to restore the diminished soft power benefits of UK aid.
Recognition of complexity: The UK must acknowledge the complex and contested nature of global development and the inherent limits of development policies and aid interventions.
Re-evaluation of private-sector aid instruments: A temporary pause in the use of private-sector mechanisms as a channel for overseas development assistance is advised, given concerns about their effectiveness in driving sustainable outcomes.
Consolidation of aid priorities: The UK should streamline its efforts, focusing on areas that demonstrate clear contributions to long-term sustainability and positive development outcomes.
Adoption of partnership models: A shift towards peer-to-peer learning and equal partnerships with global South countries is recommended, to foster equitable and respectful relationships.
Mitigation of negative impacts and improvement of policy coherence: The UK must address the unintended negative consequences of its development interventions and ensure coherence in policy-making across all government departments to enhance development outcomes.
This agenda is informed by extensive research, including thematic analysis of policy documents, semi-structured interviews with civil servants and development experts, and a detailed evaluation of 186 UK-funded projects over a 23-year period.
The proposed framework seeks to build more respectful and equal partnerships with governments and communities in the global South, enhancing support for vulnerable populations and reducing poverty. This approach is also expected to restore the diminished soft power benefits of UK aid.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | International Affairs |
Early online date | 9 Dec 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Early online - 9 Dec 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'UK aid is failing: policy recommendations towards an impactful, coherent and globally-aware development practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Participation in workshop, seminar, course
-
European Workshops in International Studies
Lazell, M. (Organiser)
3 Jul 2024 → 5 Jul 2024Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Participation in workshop, seminar, course