Understanding the performance, survival and collapse of African ad hoc military coalitions

Tony Chafer, Gordon Cumming*, Roel Van der Velde

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Ad hoc coalitions offer flexible responses to Africa’s security challenges. This article provides a comparative study of two such groupings: the Multinational Joint Task Force, which has endured, and the G5 Sahel Joint Force, which has collapsed. To explain these divergent outcomes, we begin by assessing and comparing the performance capabilities of these coalitions. We then review the “classic account” of their (under)performance, which focuses on the role of external support in sustaining coalitions. Finally, we use an organized hypocrisy lens to show how external funding only ensures a coalition’s sustainability if, firstly, political relations between participating countries and between them and donors align; and secondly, the decoupling between discourse and performance does not become too great.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages28
JournalAfrican Security
Early online date26 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 26 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Ad hoc coalitions
  • G5 Sahel Joint Force
  • MNJTF
  • organized hypocrisy
  • security

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the performance, survival and collapse of African ad hoc military coalitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this