Use of metal proximal radial endoprostheses for treatment of non-traumatic disorders: a case series

K Gokaraju; J Miles; M T R Parratt; G W Blunn; R C Pollock; J A Skinner; S R Cannon; T W R Briggs

doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.23566

Use of metal proximal radial endoprostheses for treatment of non-traumatic disorders: a case series

K Gokaraju, J Miles, M T R Parratt, G W Blunn, R C Pollock, J A Skinner, S R Cannon, T W R Briggs

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We have reviewed five adult patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic lesions. The patients had a mean age of 33.4 years (20 to 60) at the time of surgery and the mean follow-up was 7.6 years (0.8 to 16). Following surgery, all elbows were clinically stable and there was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis. Evaluation of function was assessed clinically and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, achieving a mean of 86% (70 to 100). Results at medium-term follow-up are encouraging with regards to elbow stability, implant survivorship and functional outcome.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1685-9
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
Volume	92
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.23566
Publication status	Published - Dec 2010

Keywords

Adult
Bone Neoplasms
Elbow Joint
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prostheses and Implants
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Implantation
Radiography
Radius
Range of Motion, Articular
Titanium
Treatment Outcome
Wrist Joint
Young Adult
Evaluation Studies

Access to Document

10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.23566

Cite this

@article{19e7d104e70d4559a8a79da381d587c4,

title = "Use of metal proximal radial endoprostheses for treatment of non-traumatic disorders: a case series",

abstract = "We have reviewed five adult patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic lesions. The patients had a mean age of 33.4 years (20 to 60) at the time of surgery and the mean follow-up was 7.6 years (0.8 to 16). Following surgery, all elbows were clinically stable and there was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis. Evaluation of function was assessed clinically and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, achieving a mean of 86% (70 to 100). Results at medium-term follow-up are encouraging with regards to elbow stability, implant survivorship and functional outcome.",

keywords = "Adult, Bone Neoplasms, Elbow Joint, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostheses and Implants, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Implantation, Radiography, Radius, Range of Motion, Articular, Titanium, Treatment Outcome, Wrist Joint, Young Adult, Evaluation Studies",

author = "K Gokaraju and J Miles and Parratt, {M T R} and Blunn, {G W} and Pollock, {R C} and Skinner, {J A} and Cannon, {S R} and Briggs, {T W R}",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.23566",

language = "English",

volume = "92",

pages = "1685--9",

journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume",

issn = "0301-620X",

publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of metal proximal radial endoprostheses for treatment of non-traumatic disorders

T2 - a case series

AU - Gokaraju, K

AU - Miles, J

AU - Parratt, M T R

AU - Blunn, G W

AU - Pollock, R C

AU - Skinner, J A

AU - Cannon, S R

AU - Briggs, T W R

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - We have reviewed five adult patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic lesions. The patients had a mean age of 33.4 years (20 to 60) at the time of surgery and the mean follow-up was 7.6 years (0.8 to 16). Following surgery, all elbows were clinically stable and there was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis. Evaluation of function was assessed clinically and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, achieving a mean of 86% (70 to 100). Results at medium-term follow-up are encouraging with regards to elbow stability, implant survivorship and functional outcome.

AB - We have reviewed five adult patients treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal radius following resection of non-traumatic lesions. The patients had a mean age of 33.4 years (20 to 60) at the time of surgery and the mean follow-up was 7.6 years (0.8 to 16). Following surgery, all elbows were clinically stable and there was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis. Evaluation of function was assessed clinically and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, achieving a mean of 86% (70 to 100). Results at medium-term follow-up are encouraging with regards to elbow stability, implant survivorship and functional outcome.

KW - Adult

KW - Bone Neoplasms

KW - Elbow Joint

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prostheses and Implants

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Prosthesis Implantation

KW - Radiography

KW - Radius

KW - Range of Motion, Articular

KW - Titanium

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Wrist Joint

KW - Young Adult

KW - Evaluation Studies

U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.23566

DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.23566

M3 - Article

C2 - 21119175

SN - 0301-620X

VL - 92

SP - 1685

EP - 1689

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

IS - 12

ER -

Use of metal proximal radial endoprostheses for treatment of non-traumatic disorders: a case series

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this