Users as innovators: exploring the limitations of user-driven innovation

Paul Trott, Patrick Van Der Duin, Dap Hartmann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1185 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Considering users as innovators has gained considerable support over the past 30 years. Eric von Hippel’s work in this area forms a significant part of the theoretical underpinning and evidence behind this concept. Many further studies have been undertaken to support it. It has contributed to our understanding of innovation management in general and new product development in particular. Even so, Lüthje and Herstatt emphasise that empirical findings are scarce and that the most radical innovations of the last 35 years were not developed by users. Thus, in this paper we critically review the lead-user theory and focus on three specific areas of weakness of the lead-user concept (conceptual, methodological, empirical), and argue that improvement in these areas would considerably strengthen its standing. We conclude that although lead users can contribute to the innovation process, this contribution should not be overstated, and that insufficient attention has been paid to the limitations of this theory.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-138
    JournalPrometheus
    Volume31
    Issue number2
    Early online date16 Sep 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Users as innovators: exploring the limitations of user-driven innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this