TY - JOUR
T1 - Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance
AU - Saraiva, Renan Benigno
AU - Hope, Lorraine
AU - Horselenberg, Robert
AU - Ost, James
AU - Sauer, James D.
AU - van Koppen, Peter J.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Using a mock witness methodology, we investigated the predictive value of metamemory measures and objective memory tests as indicators of eyewitness free recall performance. Participants (n = 208) first completed a metamemory assessment that included assessments of self-rated memory capacity, memory development and use of strategies. In a separate session, participants watched a mock-crime video and provided a free recall account, followed by one out of four independent memory tests (i.e., free recall, cued recall, face recognition and general knowledge). Accuracy, amount of details reported, confidence and over/underconfidence in the eyewitness free recall were the main dependent variables. Results indicated three main findings: (1) subjective assessments of memory capacity were not related to eyewitness free recall performance; (2) although individual confidence and over/underconfidence was somewhat stable across different memory tests, accuracy was less stable; and (3) individuals with higher self-rated memory capacity had a slightly stronger confidence-accuracy relation in free recall. These results are discussed with respect to metamemory assessments and performance stability across memory tests of different domains.
AB - Using a mock witness methodology, we investigated the predictive value of metamemory measures and objective memory tests as indicators of eyewitness free recall performance. Participants (n = 208) first completed a metamemory assessment that included assessments of self-rated memory capacity, memory development and use of strategies. In a separate session, participants watched a mock-crime video and provided a free recall account, followed by one out of four independent memory tests (i.e., free recall, cued recall, face recognition and general knowledge). Accuracy, amount of details reported, confidence and over/underconfidence in the eyewitness free recall were the main dependent variables. Results indicated three main findings: (1) subjective assessments of memory capacity were not related to eyewitness free recall performance; (2) although individual confidence and over/underconfidence was somewhat stable across different memory tests, accuracy was less stable; and (3) individuals with higher self-rated memory capacity had a slightly stronger confidence-accuracy relation in free recall. These results are discussed with respect to metamemory assessments and performance stability across memory tests of different domains.
KW - eyewitness testimony
KW - metamemory
KW - free recall
KW - confidence
KW - memory
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835
U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835
DO - 10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835
M3 - Article
SN - 0965-8211
VL - 28
SP - 94
EP - 106
JO - Memory
JF - Memory
IS - 1
M1 - 0
ER -