Abstract
Using a mock witness methodology, we investigated the predictive value of metamemory measures and objective memory tests as indicators of eyewitness free recall performance. Participants (n = 208) first completed a metamemory assessment that included assessments of self-rated memory capacity, memory development and use of strategies. In a separate session, participants watched a mock-crime video and provided a free recall account, followed by one out of four independent memory tests (i.e., free recall, cued recall, face recognition and general knowledge). Accuracy, amount of details reported, confidence and over/underconfidence in the eyewitness free recall were the main dependent variables. Results indicated three main findings: (1) subjective assessments of memory capacity were not related to eyewitness free recall performance; (2) although individual confidence and over/underconfidence was somewhat stable across different memory tests, accuracy was less stable; and (3) individuals with higher self-rated memory capacity had a slightly stronger confidence-accuracy relation in free recall. These results are discussed with respect to metamemory assessments and performance stability across memory tests of different domains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 0 |
| Pages (from-to) | 94-106 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Memory |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 7 Nov 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2020 |
Keywords
- eyewitness testimony
- metamemory
- free recall
- confidence
- memory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver