Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars amongst Arab interviewees: a partial replication of Leal, Vrij, Deeb and Jupe (2018)

Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij, Zarah Vernham, Gary Dalton, Louise Marie Jupe, Galit Nahari, Nir Rozmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

116 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Leal, Vrij, Deeb, and Jupe (2018) found—with British participants—that a model statement elicited (a) more information and (b) a cue to deceit: After exposure to a model statement, liars reported significantly more peripheral information than truth tellers. We sought to replicate these findings with Arabs living in Israel. Truth tellers and liars reported a stand‐out event that they had (truth tellers) or pretended to have (liars) experienced in the last 2 years. Half of the participants were given a model statement in the second phase of the interview. Replicating Leal et al. (2018a), (a) truth tellers reported more core details than liars initially and (b) a model statement resulted in more additional core and peripheral details in the second phase of the interview. Unlike in Leal et al. (2018a), a model statement did not have a differential effect on truth tellers in the current experiment.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0
Pages (from-to)1008-1017
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume33
Issue number6
Early online date14 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • RCUK
  • ESRC
  • ES/N009614/1
  • Arab participants
  • core details
  • deception
  • model statement
  • peripheral details

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars amongst Arab interviewees: a partial replication of Leal, Vrij, Deeb and Jupe (2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this