Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Vital signs and common blood tests improve the predictive power of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to predict poor outcomes across all adult ages

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Frailty is associated with poor health outcomes and is a public health challenge worldwide. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has been widely used to identify patients at risk of frailty and predict poor outcomes including long length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality for older patients. This study aimed to explore and determine variables that might influence the ability of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to predict LOS and in-hospital mortality across all adult ages.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using data from Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, UK of consecutive patient admissions over 10 years between 01/01/2010 to 31/12/2019. The study included patients aged 16 years and older. The HFRS was calculated for each patient based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes with a 2-year look-back. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Laboratory Decision Tree Early Warning Score (LDT-EWS) were calculated for each patient. Vital signs and blood tests were the first available routine data from patients after admission. We developed logistic regression models (alone and adjusted) for 9 prediction periods of length of stay and 8 prediction periods of in-hospital mortality and assessed the model performance using AUROC.

Results: Combining HFRS with the LDT-EWS had the highest discrimination (AUROC ranging from 0.764 to 0.810) compared to adjusted models (AUROC ranging from 0.716 to 0.796) or HFRS alone (AUROC ranging from 0.723 to 0.798) for 9 periods of length of stay. For in-hospital mortality, combining HFRS with NEWS had the highest discrimination (AUROC ranging from 0.786 to 0.829) compared to HFRS alone or HFRS combined with other variables for 3, 7, 10 and 14-day mortality across all adult ages. And combining HFRS with LDT-EWS had the highest discrimination (AUROC ranging from 0.789 to 0.794) for mortality after more than 14 days across all adult ages.

Conclusions: Combining HFRS with additional routinely available variables significantly improves the predictive power for length of stay and mortality. This is the first paper to show that LDT-EWS significantly improves the predictive power of Hospital Frailty Risk Scores to predict longer length of stay in hospital and later in-patient mortality across all adult ages. The predictive power of the HFRS was improved by NEWS for early in-patient mortality.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0348669
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS One
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vital signs and common blood tests improve the predictive power of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to predict poor outcomes across all adult ages'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this