Abstract
Social comparison can be limiting to pro-environmental action, as people use the perceived inaction of others to excuse their own inaction. The disrupt-then-reframe (DtR) technique can disrupt thought
processes and increase a person’s susceptibly to persuasion. We investigate how participants’ proenvironmental behaviour (PEB) intentions were affected when exposed to discourse attributed to a ‘stereotypical’ vs. ‘atypical’ environmentalist (vs. control). We predict that exposure to the ‘atypical’ environmentalist will render people more persuadable and lead to higher PEB intentions versus the other conditions.
processes and increase a person’s susceptibly to persuasion. We investigate how participants’ proenvironmental behaviour (PEB) intentions were affected when exposed to discourse attributed to a ‘stereotypical’ vs. ‘atypical’ environmentalist (vs. control). We predict that exposure to the ‘atypical’ environmentalist will render people more persuadable and lead to higher PEB intentions versus the other conditions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 25 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 8 Apr 2022 |
Event | University of Surrey Annual Open Research Lecture - Duration: 8 Apr 2022 → 8 Apr 2022 |
Conference
Conference | University of Surrey Annual Open Research Lecture |
---|---|
Period | 8/04/22 → 8/04/22 |