What drives risk disclosure in Islamic and conventional banks? An international comparison

Néjia Moumen, Rihab Grassa, Khaled Hussainey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines and compares the relationship between risk disclosure and corporate attributes in Islamic and conventional banks. Using a comprehensive risk disclosure index covering 9 dimensions, we analyze the level of risk related disclosure (RRD) in a sample of 72 Islamic banks and 97 conventional banks across 11 countries. The RRD index shows that Islamic banks disclose less information about risk comparing to conventional banks. Listed banks, larger banks and aged bank disclose more information about risk than the others. Block holders, foreign ownership and board size affect negatively risk disclosure. However, board independence and the percentage of foreign directors in the board affect positively risk disclosure. Moreover, banks with higher Tier 1 ratio disclose less information about risk. Our results encourages regulators to improve corporate governance mechanisms in their banking systems through the optimization of ownership structure (dispersed ownership) and the board’s composition in order to promote higher level of transparency and RRD.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Finance and Economics
Early online date26 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 26 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Risk disclosure
  • ownership
  • board of director
  • banks
  • Islamic banks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What drives risk disclosure in Islamic and conventional banks? An international comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this