Abstract
When asked, people dislike punishment institutions, although punishment is more effective than rewards to maintain cooperation in social dilemmas. Which institution do they choose in the long run? We study migration patterns in a laboratory experiment that allows participants to migrate continuously between punishment and reward communities. The majority of participants initially chooses the reward institution, but a substantial number of subjects joins the less profitable punishment community subsequently. In this case, the mere threat of punishment establishes high contributions. Income differences and missing compensations for cooperators in the reward community are the key factors for the decision to migrate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 109155 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Economics Letters |
Volume | 191 |
Early online date | 18 Apr 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2020 |
Keywords
- Open communities
- Voting with feet
- Cooperation
- Sanctions
- Public goods
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When to leave carrots for sticks: on the evolution of sanctioning institutions in open communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Dataset for 'When to leave carrots for sticks: on the evolution of sanctioning institutions in open communities'.
Luhan, W. (Creator), Chugunova, M. (Creator) & Nicklisch, A. (Creator), University of Portsmouth, 2020
DOI: 10.17029/0414a771-06a4-4df3-b694-72f4907ab426
Dataset
File