Who killed my relative? police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present experiment examined the ability of fifty-two uniformed police officers to detect deception. The experiment differed from previous experiments into detecting deceit because of its high stake lies scenario. The judges were exposed to videotaped press conferences of people who were asking the general public for help in finding their relatives or the murderers of their relatives. They all lied during these press conferences and they all have been found guilty of killing their own relatives. The judges did not perform better than could be expected by chance. Additional analyses showed that accuracy was unrelated to confidence, age, years of job experience in the police force, or level of experience in interviewing suspects. There was, however, a significant positive correlation between having experience in interviewing suspects and being confident in detecting deception. Finally, men were better at detecting deception than women.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-132
Number of pages14
JournalPsychology, Crime & Law
Volume7
Issue number1-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who killed my relative? police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this