Skip to content
Back to outputs

A comparison of surface and free-air temperature variability and trends at radiosonde sites and nearby high elevation surface stations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

A comparison of surface and free-air temperature variability and trends at radiosonde sites and nearby high elevation surface stations. / Pepin, Nick; Duane, W. J.

In: International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 27, No. 11, 09.2007, p. 1519-1529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Pepin, Nick ; Duane, W. J. / A comparison of surface and free-air temperature variability and trends at radiosonde sites and nearby high elevation surface stations. In: International Journal of Climatology. 2007 ; Vol. 27, No. 11. pp. 1519-1529.

Bibtex

@article{9f8f2e58d63e4b91a19878d4667894c5,
title = "A comparison of surface and free-air temperature variability and trends at radiosonde sites and nearby high elevation surface stations",
abstract = "Previous research has illustrated differences in temperature trends as measured by high elevation surface stations versus free-air temperatures interpolated to the same locations from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research's (NCAR) Re-analysis R1. This paper examines the extent to which the decision to use R1 rather than radiosonde data influenced these results. Temperatures at selected high elevation surface sites (1948–998) are paired with nearby homogeneity adjusted radiosonde data from Lanzante, Klein and Seidel (LKS). For each station pair, four mean monthly temperature anomaly time series are examined, consisting of (1) surface Global Historical Climate Network (GHCNv2)/Climate Research Unit (CRUv2) station anomalies (SF), (2) LKS radiosonde anomalies, and R1 anomalies interpolated to (3) the surface (RNSF) and (4) radiosonde (RNLKS) locations respectively. Analyses demonstrate the extent of common variance, the mean climatology of each of the four series, and differences or similarities in trends. The surface record is decoupled from the other three series especially in locations of incised topography. In 15 out of 18 pairs RNSF shows greater affinity with LKS than with SF and there is a high degree of common variance between LKS and RNSF. There is a high degree of correlation between secular trends in the two R1 series, both of which are much more similar to radiosonde than to surface trends. Trends in raw temperature and in ΔT (the surface/free-air temperature difference) both therefore show limited sensitivity to the choice of LKS radiosonde versus R1 (RNSF), apart from in a few locations in the Eurasian continent. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2007 Royal Meteorological Society",
author = "Nick Pepin and Duane, {W. J.}",
year = "2007",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1002/joc.1541",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1519--1529",
journal = "International Journal of Climatology",
issn = "0899-8418",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of surface and free-air temperature variability and trends at radiosonde sites and nearby high elevation surface stations

AU - Pepin, Nick

AU - Duane, W. J.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Previous research has illustrated differences in temperature trends as measured by high elevation surface stations versus free-air temperatures interpolated to the same locations from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research's (NCAR) Re-analysis R1. This paper examines the extent to which the decision to use R1 rather than radiosonde data influenced these results. Temperatures at selected high elevation surface sites (1948–998) are paired with nearby homogeneity adjusted radiosonde data from Lanzante, Klein and Seidel (LKS). For each station pair, four mean monthly temperature anomaly time series are examined, consisting of (1) surface Global Historical Climate Network (GHCNv2)/Climate Research Unit (CRUv2) station anomalies (SF), (2) LKS radiosonde anomalies, and R1 anomalies interpolated to (3) the surface (RNSF) and (4) radiosonde (RNLKS) locations respectively. Analyses demonstrate the extent of common variance, the mean climatology of each of the four series, and differences or similarities in trends. The surface record is decoupled from the other three series especially in locations of incised topography. In 15 out of 18 pairs RNSF shows greater affinity with LKS than with SF and there is a high degree of common variance between LKS and RNSF. There is a high degree of correlation between secular trends in the two R1 series, both of which are much more similar to radiosonde than to surface trends. Trends in raw temperature and in ΔT (the surface/free-air temperature difference) both therefore show limited sensitivity to the choice of LKS radiosonde versus R1 (RNSF), apart from in a few locations in the Eurasian continent. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

AB - Previous research has illustrated differences in temperature trends as measured by high elevation surface stations versus free-air temperatures interpolated to the same locations from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric Research's (NCAR) Re-analysis R1. This paper examines the extent to which the decision to use R1 rather than radiosonde data influenced these results. Temperatures at selected high elevation surface sites (1948–998) are paired with nearby homogeneity adjusted radiosonde data from Lanzante, Klein and Seidel (LKS). For each station pair, four mean monthly temperature anomaly time series are examined, consisting of (1) surface Global Historical Climate Network (GHCNv2)/Climate Research Unit (CRUv2) station anomalies (SF), (2) LKS radiosonde anomalies, and R1 anomalies interpolated to (3) the surface (RNSF) and (4) radiosonde (RNLKS) locations respectively. Analyses demonstrate the extent of common variance, the mean climatology of each of the four series, and differences or similarities in trends. The surface record is decoupled from the other three series especially in locations of incised topography. In 15 out of 18 pairs RNSF shows greater affinity with LKS than with SF and there is a high degree of common variance between LKS and RNSF. There is a high degree of correlation between secular trends in the two R1 series, both of which are much more similar to radiosonde than to surface trends. Trends in raw temperature and in ΔT (the surface/free-air temperature difference) both therefore show limited sensitivity to the choice of LKS radiosonde versus R1 (RNSF), apart from in a few locations in the Eurasian continent. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

U2 - 10.1002/joc.1541

DO - 10.1002/joc.1541

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1519

EP - 1529

JO - International Journal of Climatology

JF - International Journal of Climatology

SN - 0899-8418

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 139777