Skip to content
Back to outputs

A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs)using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs)using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study. / Labib, Ashraf; Abdi, R.

In: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 10, 10.07.2003, p. 2273-2299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Labib, Ashraf ; Abdi, R. / A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs)using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study. In: International Journal of Production Research. 2003 ; Vol. 41, No. 10. pp. 2273-2299.

Bibtex

@article{7163c6b95e9345898ee4d251d3f457c1,
title = "A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs)using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study",
abstract = "This paper presents Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) characteristics through comparison with conventional manufacturing systems in order to address a design strategy towards a RMS. The strategy is considered as a part of a RMS design loop to achieve a reconfigurable strategy over its implementation period. Asanother part of the design loop, a reconfiguration link between market and manufacturing ispres ented in order to group products into families (reconfiguring products) and then assign them to the required manufacturing processes over configuration stages. In particular, the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is employed for structuring the decision making process for the selection of a manufacturing system among feasible alternatives based on the RMS study. Manufacturing responsiveness is considered as the ability of using existing resources to reflect new environmental and technological changes quickly. The AHP model highlights manufacturing responsiveness as a new economic objective along with classical objectives such as low cost and high quality. The forward-backward process is then proposed to direct and control the design strategy under uncertain conditions during its implementation period. The proposed hierarchy is generic in structure and could be applicable to many firms by means of restructuring the criteria. This work is based on a case study in a manufacturing environment. Expert Choice software (Expert Choice 1999) is applied to examine the structure of the proposed model and achieve synthesise/ graphical results considering inconsistency ratios. The results are examined by monitoring sensitivity analysis while changing the criteria priorities. Finally, to allocate available resources to the alternative solutions, a (0–1) knapsack formulation algorithm is represented.",
author = "Ashraf Labib and R. Abdi",
year = "2003",
month = jul,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/0020754031000077266",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "2273--2299",
journal = "International Journal of Production Research",
issn = "0020-7543",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs)using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study

AU - Labib, Ashraf

AU - Abdi, R.

PY - 2003/7/10

Y1 - 2003/7/10

N2 - This paper presents Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) characteristics through comparison with conventional manufacturing systems in order to address a design strategy towards a RMS. The strategy is considered as a part of a RMS design loop to achieve a reconfigurable strategy over its implementation period. Asanother part of the design loop, a reconfiguration link between market and manufacturing ispres ented in order to group products into families (reconfiguring products) and then assign them to the required manufacturing processes over configuration stages. In particular, the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is employed for structuring the decision making process for the selection of a manufacturing system among feasible alternatives based on the RMS study. Manufacturing responsiveness is considered as the ability of using existing resources to reflect new environmental and technological changes quickly. The AHP model highlights manufacturing responsiveness as a new economic objective along with classical objectives such as low cost and high quality. The forward-backward process is then proposed to direct and control the design strategy under uncertain conditions during its implementation period. The proposed hierarchy is generic in structure and could be applicable to many firms by means of restructuring the criteria. This work is based on a case study in a manufacturing environment. Expert Choice software (Expert Choice 1999) is applied to examine the structure of the proposed model and achieve synthesise/ graphical results considering inconsistency ratios. The results are examined by monitoring sensitivity analysis while changing the criteria priorities. Finally, to allocate available resources to the alternative solutions, a (0–1) knapsack formulation algorithm is represented.

AB - This paper presents Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) characteristics through comparison with conventional manufacturing systems in order to address a design strategy towards a RMS. The strategy is considered as a part of a RMS design loop to achieve a reconfigurable strategy over its implementation period. Asanother part of the design loop, a reconfiguration link between market and manufacturing ispres ented in order to group products into families (reconfiguring products) and then assign them to the required manufacturing processes over configuration stages. In particular, the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is employed for structuring the decision making process for the selection of a manufacturing system among feasible alternatives based on the RMS study. Manufacturing responsiveness is considered as the ability of using existing resources to reflect new environmental and technological changes quickly. The AHP model highlights manufacturing responsiveness as a new economic objective along with classical objectives such as low cost and high quality. The forward-backward process is then proposed to direct and control the design strategy under uncertain conditions during its implementation period. The proposed hierarchy is generic in structure and could be applicable to many firms by means of restructuring the criteria. This work is based on a case study in a manufacturing environment. Expert Choice software (Expert Choice 1999) is applied to examine the structure of the proposed model and achieve synthesise/ graphical results considering inconsistency ratios. The results are examined by monitoring sensitivity analysis while changing the criteria priorities. Finally, to allocate available resources to the alternative solutions, a (0–1) knapsack formulation algorithm is represented.

U2 - 10.1080/0020754031000077266

DO - 10.1080/0020754031000077266

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 2273

EP - 2299

JO - International Journal of Production Research

JF - International Journal of Production Research

SN - 0020-7543

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 119593