Skip to content
Back to outputs

A proximal perspective on disgust

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard

A proximal perspective on disgust. / Stevenson, Richard; Case, Trevor; Oaten, Megan; Stafford, Lorenzo; Saluja, Supreet .

In: Emotion Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.07.2019, p. 209-255.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Stevenson, R, Case, T, Oaten, M, Stafford, L & Saluja, S 2019, 'A proximal perspective on disgust', Emotion Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 209-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919853355

APA

Stevenson, R., Case, T., Oaten, M., Stafford, L., & Saluja, S. (2019). A proximal perspective on disgust. Emotion Review, 11(3), 209-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919853355

Vancouver

Stevenson R, Case T, Oaten M, Stafford L, Saluja S. A proximal perspective on disgust. Emotion Review. 2019 Jul 1;11(3):209-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919853355

Author

Stevenson, Richard ; Case, Trevor ; Oaten, Megan ; Stafford, Lorenzo ; Saluja, Supreet . / A proximal perspective on disgust. In: Emotion Review. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 209-255.

Bibtex

@article{aaf387c36b89439fa099e0ed0ff6601e,
title = "A proximal perspective on disgust",
abstract = "The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.",
author = "Richard Stevenson and Trevor Case and Megan Oaten and Lorenzo Stafford and Supreet Saluja",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1754073919853355",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "209--255",
journal = "Emotion Review",
issn = "1754-0739",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A proximal perspective on disgust

AU - Stevenson, Richard

AU - Case, Trevor

AU - Oaten, Megan

AU - Stafford, Lorenzo

AU - Saluja, Supreet

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.

AB - The functional basis of disgust in disease avoidance is widely accepted; however, there is disagreement over what disgust is. This is a significant problem, as basic questions about disgust require knowing if single/multiple forms/processes exist. We address this issue with a new model with one form of disgust generated by multiple processes: (a) pure disgust experienced during gastrointestinal illness; (b) somatosensory disgust elicited by specific cues that activate the pure disgust state; (c) anticipatory disgust elicited by associations between distance cues for somatosensory disgust and requiring threat evaluation; (d) simulated disgusts elicited by imagining somatosensory and anticipatory disgust and frequently involving other emotions. Different contamination processes interlink (a–d). The implications of our model for fundamental questions about disgust (e.g., emotion status; continuation into animals) are examined.

U2 - 10.1177/1754073919853355

DO - 10.1177/1754073919853355

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 209

EP - 255

JO - Emotion Review

JF - Emotion Review

SN - 1754-0739

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 14586894