Skip to content

A template for an improved rock-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian time scale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  • Graham A. Shields
  • Susannah M. Porter
  • Galen P. Halverson
  • Francis A. Macdonald
  • Kenneth A. Plumb
  • Carlos J. De Alvarenga
  • Dhiraj M. Banerjee
  • Andrey Bekker
  • Wouter Bleeker
  • Alexander Brasier
  • Partha P. Chakraborty
  • Alan S. Collins
  • Kent Condie
  • Kaushik Das
  • David A. D. Evans
  • Richard Ernst
  • Anthony E. Fallick
  • Hartwig Frimmel
  • Reinhardt Fuck
  • Paul F. Hoffman
  • Balz S. Kamber
  • Anton B. Kuznetsov
  • Ross N. Mitchell
  • Daniel G. Poiré
  • Simon W. Poulton
  • Robert Riding
  • Mukund Sharma
  • Eva Stueeken
  • Rosalie Tostevin
  • Elizabeth Turner
  • Shuhai Xiao
  • Shuanhong Zhang
  • Ying Zhou
  • Maoyan Zhu
The geological time scale before 720 Ma uses rounded absolute ages rather than specific events recorded in rocks to subdivide time. This has led increasingly to mismatches between subdivisions and the features for which they were named. Here we review the formal processes that led to the current time scale, outline rock-based concepts that could be used to subdivide pre-Cryogenian time and propose revisions. An appraisal of the Precambrian rock record confirms that purely chronostratigraphic subdivision would require only modest deviation from current chronometric boundaries, removal of which could be expedited by establishing event-based concepts and provisional, approximate ages for eon-, era- and period-level subdivisions. Our review leads to the following conclusions: 1) the current informal four-fold Archean subdivision should be simplified to a tripartite scheme, pending more detailed analysis, and 2) an improved rock-based Proterozoic Eon might comprise a Paleoproterozoic Era with three periods (early Paleoproterozoic or Skourian, Rhyacian, Orosirian), Mesoproterozoic Era with four periods (Statherian, Calymmian, Ectasian, Stenian) and a Neoproterozoic Era with four periods (pre-Tonian or Kleisian, Tonian, Cryogenian and Ediacaran). These proposals stem from a wide community and could be used to guide future development of the pre-Cryogenian timescale by international bodies.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberjgs2020-222
JournalJournal of the Geological Society
Early online date11 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 11 Jun 2021

Documents

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 28190097