Skip to content

Analysing openly recorded pre‐interview deliberations to detect deceit in collective interviews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sham marriages occur frequently and, to detect them, partners are sometimes interviewed together. We examined an innovative method to detect deceit in such interviews. Fifty‐three pairs of interviewees, either friends (truth tellers) or pretended to be friends (liars), were interviewed about their friendship. Just before the interview, they received the questions that would be asked in the interview and were invited to prepare the answers. We told them that these pre‐interview deliberations would be recorded. Based on the transcripts we analysed cues to truthfulness (cues expected to be expressed more by truth tellers) and cues to deceit (cues expected to be expressed more by liars). Truth tellers and liars differed from each other, particularly regarding expressing cues to truthfulness. Pre‐interview deliberations that are recorded with awareness of the interviewees can be used for lie detection purposes. We discuss further venues in this new line of research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Early online date10 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 10 Aug 2019

Documents

  • Analysing openly recorded pre-interview deliberations

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Vrij, A, Jupe, LM, Leal, S, Vernham, Z, Nahari, G. Analysing openly recorded pre‐interview deliberations to detect deceit in collective interviews. Appl Cognit Psychol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3601, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3601. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 787 KB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 10/08/20

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 15156669