Antisemitism and racism in Britain: assessing the reaction to and the legacy of Kristallnacht in Britain
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
Standard
Antisemitism and racism in Britain : assessing the reaction to and the legacy of Kristallnacht in Britain. / Burkett, Jodi.
Violence, Memory and History: Western Perspectives of Kristallnacht. ed. / Colin McCullough; Nathan Wilson. 1st. ed. Routledge, 2014. p. 16-33 (Routledge Studies in Modern European History).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Antisemitism and racism in Britain
T2 - assessing the reaction to and the legacy of Kristallnacht in Britain
AU - Burkett, Jodi
PY - 2014/9/15
Y1 - 2014/9/15
N2 - This chapter focuses on Mosley and his pre and postwar activities and affiliations. The sociopolitical realities present in those states as well as the dynamics of their relationship with Germany influenced their reactions; the prevalence of anti-Semitism within their populations also had an effect. Kristallnacht is retrospectively seen as a portent of the Holocaust. Cowling argues that Chamberlain felt he had to ignore events like Kristallnacht in order to maintain a good relationship with Adolf Hitler after the Munich deal was brokered. Parker also highlights the importance of Ogilvie-Forbes’s reaction to the events. The issue of naturalization also shows an acceptance of the idea that any Jewish refugees were still very much foreigners. Robert Skidelsky broke with Benewick’s interpretation of fascism and anti-Semitism in Britain, arguing that anti-Semitism was not central to Mosley’s politics despite his fascism. The official policy of Mosley’s postwar Union Movement (UM) was explicitly not anti-Semitic.
AB - This chapter focuses on Mosley and his pre and postwar activities and affiliations. The sociopolitical realities present in those states as well as the dynamics of their relationship with Germany influenced their reactions; the prevalence of anti-Semitism within their populations also had an effect. Kristallnacht is retrospectively seen as a portent of the Holocaust. Cowling argues that Chamberlain felt he had to ignore events like Kristallnacht in order to maintain a good relationship with Adolf Hitler after the Munich deal was brokered. Parker also highlights the importance of Ogilvie-Forbes’s reaction to the events. The issue of naturalization also shows an acceptance of the idea that any Jewish refugees were still very much foreigners. Robert Skidelsky broke with Benewick’s interpretation of fascism and anti-Semitism in Britain, arguing that anti-Semitism was not central to Mosley’s politics despite his fascism. The official policy of Mosley’s postwar Union Movement (UM) was explicitly not anti-Semitic.
U2 - 10.4324/9781315879567-2
DO - 10.4324/9781315879567-2
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 9780415716321
T3 - Routledge Studies in Modern European History
SP - 16
EP - 33
BT - Violence, Memory and History
A2 - McCullough, Colin
A2 - Wilson, Nathan
PB - Routledge
ER -
ID: 2142030