Skip to content

BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • K. C. Chan
  • M. Crocce
  • A. J. Ross
  • S. Avila
  • J. Elvin-Poole
  • M. Manera
  • W. J. Percival
  • R. Rosenfeld
  • T. M. C. Abbott
  • F. B. Abdalla
  • S. Allam
  • E. Bertin
  • D. Brooks
  • D. L. Burke
  • A. Carnero Rosell
  • M. Carrasco Kind
  • J. Carretero
  • F. J. Castander
  • C. E. Cunha
  • C. B. D'Andrea
  • L. N. da Costa
  • C. Davis
  • J. De Vicente
  • T. F. Eifler
  • J. Estrada
  • B. Flaugher
  • P. Fosalba
  • J. Frieman
  • J. García-Bellido
  • E. Gaztanaga
  • D. W. Gerdes
  • D. Gruen
  • R. A. Gruendl
  • J. Gschwend
  • G. Gutierrez
  • W. G. Hartley
  • K. Honscheid
  • B. Hoyle
  • D. J. James
  • E. Krause
  • K. Kuehn
  • O. Lahav
  • M. Lima
  • M. March
  • F. Menanteau
  • C. J. Miller
  • R. Miquel
  • A. A. Plazas
  • K. Reil
  • A. Roodman
  • E. Sanchez
  • V. Scarpine
  • I. Sevilla-Noarbe
  • M. Smith
  • M. Soares-Santos
  • F. Sobreira
  • E. Suchyta
  • M. E. C. Swanson
  • G. Tarle
  • A. R. Walker
We study the methodology and potential theoretical systematics of measuring baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) using the angular correlation functions in tomographic bins. We calibrate and optimize the pipeline for the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data set using 1800 mocks. We compare the BAO fitting results obtained with three estimators: the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), Profile Likelihood, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo. The fit results from the MLE are the least biased and their derived 1σ error bar are closest to the Gaussian distribution value after removing the extreme mocks with non-detected BAO signal. We show that incorrect assumptions in constructing the template, such as mismatches from the cosmology of the mocks or the underlying photo-z errors, can lead to BAO angular shifts. We find that MLE is the method that best traces this systematic biases, allowing to recover the true angular distance values. In a real survey analysis, it may happen that the final data sample properties are slightly different from those of the mock catalogue. We show that the effect on the mock covariance due to the sample differences can be corrected with the help of the Gaussian covariance matrix or more effectively using the eigenmode expansion of the mock covariance. In the eigenmode expansion, the eigenmodes are provided by some proxy covariance matrix. The eigenmode expansion is significantly less susceptible to statistical fluctuations relative to the direct measurements of the covariance matrix because of the number of free parameters is substantially reduced.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbersty2036
Pages (from-to)3031-3051
Number of pages21
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume480
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Documents

  • sty2036

    Rights statement: This article has been accepted for publication in MNRAS ©: 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

    Final published version, 5.59 MB, PDF document

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 11029514