Skip to content

Comparing approximate methods for mock catalogues and covariance matrices III: bispectrum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Manuel Colavincenzo
  • Emiliano Sefusatti
  • Pierluigi Monaco
  • Linda Blot
  • Martin Crocce
  • Martha Lippich
  • Ariel G. Sánchez
  • Marcelo A. Alvarez
  • Aniket Agrawal
  • Santiago Avila
  • Andrés Balaguera-Antolínez
  • Richard Bond
  • Sandrine Codis
  • Claudio Dalla Vecchia
  • Antonio Dorta
  • Pablo Fosalba
  • Francisco-Shu Kitaura
  • Marcos Pellejero-Ibanez
  • George Stein
  • Mohammadjavad Vakili
  • Gustavo Yepes
We compare the measurements of the bispectrum and the estimate of its covariance obtained from a set of different methods for the efficient generation of approximate dark matter halo catalogues to the same quantities obtained from full N-body simulations. To this purpose we employ a large set of 300 realizations of the same cosmology for each method, run with matching initial conditions in order to reduce the contribution of cosmic variance to the comparison. In addition, we compare how the error on cosmological parameters such as linear and non-linear bias parameters depends on the approximate method used for the determination of the bispectrum variance. As general result, most methods provide errors within 10 per cent of the errors estimated from N-body simulations. Exceptions are those methods requiring calibration of the clustering amplitude but restrict this to 2-point statistics. Finally we test how our results are affected by being limited to a few hundreds measurements from N-body simulation by comparing with a larger set of several thousands of realizations performed with one approximate method.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4883–4905
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Issue number4
Early online date1 Nov 2018
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019


  • Comparing approximate methods

    Rights statement: This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2018 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

    Final published version, 12.7 MB, PDF document

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 10769203