Comparison of the National Early Warning Score in non-elective medical and surgical patients
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Methods - Hospital-wide data over 31 months, from adult inpatients who stayed at least one night or died on the day of admission, were analysed. The data were categorized as elective or non-elective surgical or medical admissions. The ability of NEWS to discriminate the outcomes above in these different groups was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results - There were too few outcomes to permit meaningful comparison of elective admissions so the analysis was constrained to comparison of non-elective admissions. NEWS performed equally well, or better, for surgical as for medical patients. For death within 24 h the AUROC for surgical admissions was 0.914 (95 per cent c.i. 0.907 to 0.922), compared with 0.902 (0.898 to 0.905) for medical admissions. For the combined outcome of any of death, cardiac arrest or unanticipated ICU admission, the AUROC was 0.874 (0.868 to 0.880) for surgical admissions and 0.874 (0.871 to 0.877) for medical admissions.
Conclusion - NEWS discriminated deterioration in non-elective surgical patients at least as well as in non-elective medical patients.
|Journal||British Journal of Surgery|
|Early online date||3 Aug 2016|
|State||Published - Sep 2016|
- Is the UK National Early Warning Score suitable for use in surgical patients 20160425
Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Kovacs, C., Jarvis, S. W., Prytherch, D. R., Meredith, P., Schmidt, P. E., Briggs, J. S. and Smith, G. B. (2016), Comparison of the National Early Warning Score in non-elective medical and surgical patients. Br J Surg, 103: 1385–1393, which has been published in final form at 10.1002_bjs.10267. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 180 KB, PDF-document