Skip to content
Back to outputs

Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics. / Carrabba, Michele; Vichi, Alessandro; Louca, Chris; Ferrari, Marco.

In: The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 16.08.2017, p. 257-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Carrabba, M, Vichi, A, Louca, C & Ferrari, M 2017, 'Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics', The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 257-264. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257

APA

Carrabba, M., Vichi, A., Louca, C., & Ferrari, M. (2017). Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 9(4), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257

Vancouver

Carrabba M, Vichi A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2017 Aug 16;9(4):257-264. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257

Author

Carrabba, Michele ; Vichi, Alessandro ; Louca, Chris ; Ferrari, Marco. / Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics. In: The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 257-264.

Bibtex

@article{5317a52c061a4043ae06c6d9e39be687,
title = "Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion to CAD/CAM feldspathic blocks by failure analysis and shear bond strength test (SBSt) of different restorative systems and different surface treatments, for purpose of moderate chipping repair. Materials and methods: A self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr) containing bi-functional phosphate monomers and a conventional flowable resin composite (Premise Flow, Kerr) applied with and without adhesive system (Optibond Solo Plus, Kerr) were combined with three different surface treatments (Hydrofluoric Acid Etching, Sandblasting, combination of both) for repairing feldspathic ceramics. Two commercial systems for ceramic repairing were tested as controls (Porcelain Repair Kit, Ultradent, and CoJet System, 3M). SBSt was performed and failure mode was evaluated using a digital microscope. A One-Way ANOVA (Tukey test for post hoc) was applied to the SBSt data and the Fisher{\textquoteright}s Exact Test was applied to the failure analysis data. Results: The use of resin systems containing bi-functional phosphate monomers combined with hydrofluoric acid etching of the ceramic surface gave the highest values in terms of bond strength and of more favorable failure modalities. Conclusion: The simplified repairing method based on self-adhering flowable resin combined with the use of hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength values and a favorable failure mode. Repairing of ceramic chipping with a self-adhering flowable resin associated with hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength with a less time consuming and technique-sensitive procedure compared to standard procedure. ",
keywords = "phosphate acid monomers, ceramics, surface treatment, chipping repair, ceramic repair system",
author = "Michele Carrabba and Alessandro Vichi and Chris Louca and Marco Ferrari",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
day = "16",
doi = "10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "257--264",
journal = "The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics",
issn = "2005-7806",
publisher = "The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics

AU - Carrabba, Michele

AU - Vichi, Alessandro

AU - Louca, Chris

AU - Ferrari, Marco

PY - 2017/8/16

Y1 - 2017/8/16

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion to CAD/CAM feldspathic blocks by failure analysis and shear bond strength test (SBSt) of different restorative systems and different surface treatments, for purpose of moderate chipping repair. Materials and methods: A self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr) containing bi-functional phosphate monomers and a conventional flowable resin composite (Premise Flow, Kerr) applied with and without adhesive system (Optibond Solo Plus, Kerr) were combined with three different surface treatments (Hydrofluoric Acid Etching, Sandblasting, combination of both) for repairing feldspathic ceramics. Two commercial systems for ceramic repairing were tested as controls (Porcelain Repair Kit, Ultradent, and CoJet System, 3M). SBSt was performed and failure mode was evaluated using a digital microscope. A One-Way ANOVA (Tukey test for post hoc) was applied to the SBSt data and the Fisher’s Exact Test was applied to the failure analysis data. Results: The use of resin systems containing bi-functional phosphate monomers combined with hydrofluoric acid etching of the ceramic surface gave the highest values in terms of bond strength and of more favorable failure modalities. Conclusion: The simplified repairing method based on self-adhering flowable resin combined with the use of hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength values and a favorable failure mode. Repairing of ceramic chipping with a self-adhering flowable resin associated with hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength with a less time consuming and technique-sensitive procedure compared to standard procedure.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the adhesion to CAD/CAM feldspathic blocks by failure analysis and shear bond strength test (SBSt) of different restorative systems and different surface treatments, for purpose of moderate chipping repair. Materials and methods: A self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr) containing bi-functional phosphate monomers and a conventional flowable resin composite (Premise Flow, Kerr) applied with and without adhesive system (Optibond Solo Plus, Kerr) were combined with three different surface treatments (Hydrofluoric Acid Etching, Sandblasting, combination of both) for repairing feldspathic ceramics. Two commercial systems for ceramic repairing were tested as controls (Porcelain Repair Kit, Ultradent, and CoJet System, 3M). SBSt was performed and failure mode was evaluated using a digital microscope. A One-Way ANOVA (Tukey test for post hoc) was applied to the SBSt data and the Fisher’s Exact Test was applied to the failure analysis data. Results: The use of resin systems containing bi-functional phosphate monomers combined with hydrofluoric acid etching of the ceramic surface gave the highest values in terms of bond strength and of more favorable failure modalities. Conclusion: The simplified repairing method based on self-adhering flowable resin combined with the use of hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength values and a favorable failure mode. Repairing of ceramic chipping with a self-adhering flowable resin associated with hydrofluoric acid etching showed high bond strength with a less time consuming and technique-sensitive procedure compared to standard procedure.

KW - phosphate acid monomers

KW - ceramics

KW - surface treatment

KW - chipping repair

KW - ceramic repair system

U2 - 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257

DO - 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 257

EP - 264

JO - The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

JF - The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

SN - 2005-7806

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 8149837