Skip to content
Back to outputs

Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts. / Izotovas, Aleksandras; Vrij, Aldert; Hope, Lorraine; Strömwall, Leif A.; Granhag, Pär A.; Mann, Samantha.

In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Vol. 17, No. 3, 16.10.2020, p. 224-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Izotovas, A, Vrij, A, Hope, L, Strömwall, LA, Granhag, PA & Mann, S 2020, 'Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts', Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1561

APA

Izotovas, A., Vrij, A., Hope, L., Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Mann, S. (2020). Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(3), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1561

Vancouver

Izotovas A, Vrij A, Hope L, Strömwall LA, Granhag PA, Mann S. Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 2020 Oct 16;17(3):224-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1561

Author

Izotovas, Aleksandras ; Vrij, Aldert ; Hope, Lorraine ; Strömwall, Leif A. ; Granhag, Pär A. ; Mann, Samantha. / Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts. In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 2020 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 224-237.

Bibtex

@article{a680d59fa5e04bebb74d837288ca4368,
title = "Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts",
abstract = "In this study, we examined how different types of interviewing (eliciting more complete vs. less complete accounts) used in an interview conducted shortly after an event affected truth tellers' and liars' responses when they were interviewed again after a two‐week delay. Participants (n = 80) were shown a mock intelligence operation video and told either the truth or lied about its contents in two interviews, immediately after watching the video, and after a two‐week delay. In the immediate interview participants were instructed either to report everything they remembered, or asked spatial questions related to the event. In the delayed interview, all participants were asked to report everything. The differences between truth tellers and liars were slightly larger in the report everything than in the spatial questions condition. Results suggest that an immediate “report everything” instruction can aid to effectively discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts.",
author = "Aleksandras Izotovas and Aldert Vrij and Lorraine Hope and Str{\"o}mwall, {Leif A.} and Granhag, {P{\"a}r A.} and Samantha Mann",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/jip.1561",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "224--237",
journal = "Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling",
issn = "1544-4759",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deception detection in repeated interviews: the effects of immediate type of questioning on the delayed accounts

AU - Izotovas, Aleksandras

AU - Vrij, Aldert

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Strömwall, Leif A.

AU - Granhag, Pär A.

AU - Mann, Samantha

PY - 2020/10/16

Y1 - 2020/10/16

N2 - In this study, we examined how different types of interviewing (eliciting more complete vs. less complete accounts) used in an interview conducted shortly after an event affected truth tellers' and liars' responses when they were interviewed again after a two‐week delay. Participants (n = 80) were shown a mock intelligence operation video and told either the truth or lied about its contents in two interviews, immediately after watching the video, and after a two‐week delay. In the immediate interview participants were instructed either to report everything they remembered, or asked spatial questions related to the event. In the delayed interview, all participants were asked to report everything. The differences between truth tellers and liars were slightly larger in the report everything than in the spatial questions condition. Results suggest that an immediate “report everything” instruction can aid to effectively discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts.

AB - In this study, we examined how different types of interviewing (eliciting more complete vs. less complete accounts) used in an interview conducted shortly after an event affected truth tellers' and liars' responses when they were interviewed again after a two‐week delay. Participants (n = 80) were shown a mock intelligence operation video and told either the truth or lied about its contents in two interviews, immediately after watching the video, and after a two‐week delay. In the immediate interview participants were instructed either to report everything they remembered, or asked spatial questions related to the event. In the delayed interview, all participants were asked to report everything. The differences between truth tellers and liars were slightly larger in the report everything than in the spatial questions condition. Results suggest that an immediate “report everything” instruction can aid to effectively discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts.

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jip.1561

U2 - 10.1002/jip.1561

DO - 10.1002/jip.1561

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 224

EP - 237

JO - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

JF - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

SN - 1544-4759

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 22796882