Skip to content
Back to outputs

Evaluating the case for greater use of private prosecutions in England and Wales for fraud offences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Evaluating the case for greater use of private prosecutions in England and Wales for fraud offences. / Lewis, Chris; Brooks, G.; Button, Mark; Shepherd, D.; Wakefield, Alison.

In: International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, Vol. 42, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 3-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Lewis, Chris ; Brooks, G. ; Button, Mark ; Shepherd, D. ; Wakefield, Alison. / Evaluating the case for greater use of private prosecutions in England and Wales for fraud offences. In: International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 3-15.

Bibtex

@article{0231a1283a634c1eb34bfa6d2cb0a854,
title = "Evaluating the case for greater use of private prosecutions in England and Wales for fraud offences",
abstract = "This paper considers the challenges and opportunities that exist in England and Wales for the use of private prosecutions for Fraud. It considers the need for sanctions against fraudsters: looks at the prosecution landscape as it has evolved, especially during the 21st century: considers the legal basis for private prosecution and gives a brief history of its extent. The advantages and disadvantages associated with private prosecution are considered and recommendations made on the changes needed before there could be significant developments in the use of private prosecutions.",
author = "Chris Lewis and G. Brooks and Mark Button and D. Shepherd and Alison Wakefield",
note = "“NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in <Journal title>. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PUBLICATION, [VOL#, ISSUE#, (DATE)] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.11.001¨",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "3--15",
journal = "International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice",
issn = "1756-0616",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the case for greater use of private prosecutions in England and Wales for fraud offences

AU - Lewis, Chris

AU - Brooks, G.

AU - Button, Mark

AU - Shepherd, D.

AU - Wakefield, Alison

N1 - “NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in <Journal title>. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PUBLICATION, [VOL#, ISSUE#, (DATE)] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.11.001¨

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - This paper considers the challenges and opportunities that exist in England and Wales for the use of private prosecutions for Fraud. It considers the need for sanctions against fraudsters: looks at the prosecution landscape as it has evolved, especially during the 21st century: considers the legal basis for private prosecution and gives a brief history of its extent. The advantages and disadvantages associated with private prosecution are considered and recommendations made on the changes needed before there could be significant developments in the use of private prosecutions.

AB - This paper considers the challenges and opportunities that exist in England and Wales for the use of private prosecutions for Fraud. It considers the need for sanctions against fraudsters: looks at the prosecution landscape as it has evolved, especially during the 21st century: considers the legal basis for private prosecution and gives a brief history of its extent. The advantages and disadvantages associated with private prosecution are considered and recommendations made on the changes needed before there could be significant developments in the use of private prosecutions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 3

EP - 15

JO - International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice

JF - International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice

SN - 1756-0616

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 1522423