Skip to content
Back to outputs

Explaining conversation rules to children: an intervention study to facilitate children's accurate responses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Explaining conversation rules to children: an intervention study to facilitate children's accurate responses. / Mulder, M.; Vrij, Aldert.

In: Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 20, No. 7, 07.1996, p. 623-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{dc01467a9e9c4f268b1b3fb8365acb84,
title = "Explaining conversation rules to children: an intervention study to facilitate children's accurate responses",
abstract = "In the past few years there has been increased concern over the role of social influences on children's reports during interviews. It is argued that the number of wrong answers can be reduced by explaining a set of social rules of conversation to children at the beginning of an interview. In the present experiment, the effects of two conversation rules were tested. Children were informed that (a) “I-don't-know” is an acceptable answer, and (b) the interviewer would not be able to help them in answering the questions. A total of 114 children, aged 4 to 10, watched a staged event and were interviewed afterwards. The two factors were systematically varied in the experiment by utilizing a 2 × 2 factorial design. The results supported the hypotheses that introduction of these rules would reduce suggestibility. Our findings have implications for interviewing child witnesses.",
author = "M. Mulder and Aldert Vrij",
year = "1996",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/0145-2134(96)00050-6",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "623--631",
journal = "Child Abuse & Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining conversation rules to children: an intervention study to facilitate children's accurate responses

AU - Mulder, M.

AU - Vrij, Aldert

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - In the past few years there has been increased concern over the role of social influences on children's reports during interviews. It is argued that the number of wrong answers can be reduced by explaining a set of social rules of conversation to children at the beginning of an interview. In the present experiment, the effects of two conversation rules were tested. Children were informed that (a) “I-don't-know” is an acceptable answer, and (b) the interviewer would not be able to help them in answering the questions. A total of 114 children, aged 4 to 10, watched a staged event and were interviewed afterwards. The two factors were systematically varied in the experiment by utilizing a 2 × 2 factorial design. The results supported the hypotheses that introduction of these rules would reduce suggestibility. Our findings have implications for interviewing child witnesses.

AB - In the past few years there has been increased concern over the role of social influences on children's reports during interviews. It is argued that the number of wrong answers can be reduced by explaining a set of social rules of conversation to children at the beginning of an interview. In the present experiment, the effects of two conversation rules were tested. Children were informed that (a) “I-don't-know” is an acceptable answer, and (b) the interviewer would not be able to help them in answering the questions. A total of 114 children, aged 4 to 10, watched a staged event and were interviewed afterwards. The two factors were systematically varied in the experiment by utilizing a 2 × 2 factorial design. The results supported the hypotheses that introduction of these rules would reduce suggestibility. Our findings have implications for interviewing child witnesses.

U2 - 10.1016/0145-2134(96)00050-6

DO - 10.1016/0145-2134(96)00050-6

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 623

EP - 631

JO - Child Abuse & Neglect

JF - Child Abuse & Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 225899