Skip to content

Gender differences in the perceived impact that athlete leaders have on team member emotional states

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Emotional contagion has been recognized as a variable influencing individual behaviour and team functioning. In particular, leaders within the team have been suggested to have a significant impact on their teammates through the expression of their emotions. As a result, the aim of this study was to provide greater insight into how different athlete leaders impact the emotional state of their team members, and whether gender differences existed in these relationships. Participants were 295 university student-athletes (200 male and 95 female) recruited from four universities in the UK. Data were collected in a two-step process. First, a voting/rating procedure was conducted within team to identify dominant task, motivational, social and external leaders. Then, participants completed the emotional contagion subscale of the Measure of Empathetic Tendency to rate the impact different athlete leaders had upon their emotional state. A MANOVA was conducted to explore gender differences in reported emotional susceptibility by leadership role. Subsequent ANOVAs highlighted significant differences between leadership role scores for female participants only. The results suggest that female athletes are more susceptible to emotional influence than male athletes. Furthermore, female athletes experienced a greater variation in the perceived emotional influence of different leadership roles in the team.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Early online date21 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 21 Mar 2020

Documents

  • Gender differences in the perceived impact

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sports Sciences on 21/3/20, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02640414.2020.1745460.

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 1.02 MB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 21/03/21

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 20488942