Skip to content
Back to outputs

Lying about flying: the efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Lying about flying: the efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit. / Vrij, Aldert; Leal, Sharon; Deeb, Haneen; Chan, Stephanie; Khader, Majeed; Xiau‐Ting, Chai; Chin, Jeffery.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, 06.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Vrij, Aldert ; Leal, Sharon ; Deeb, Haneen ; Chan, Stephanie ; Khader, Majeed ; Xiau‐Ting, Chai ; Chin, Jeffery. / Lying about flying: the efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2019.

Bibtex

@article{86a4115e973948fe89ecb490330ccdfe,
title = "Lying about flying: the efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit",
abstract = "Due to time constraints interviews aimed to detect deception in airport settings should be brief and veracity assessments should be made in real time. In two experiments carried out in the departure hall of an international airport, truth tellers were asked to report truthfully their forthcoming trip, whereas liars were asked to lie about the purpose of their trip. In Experiment 1 we examined five verbal cues we thought had potential to discriminate truth tellers from liars in short airport interviews: Elaboration in disclosing information, checkable details, how many people are aware of the trip, complications, and plausibility. In Experiment 2 we attempted to improve the interview protocol by adding a second interview phase in which we introduced an Information Protocol and Model Statement. All five cues differentiated truth tellers from liars in both experiments but the Information Protocol and Model Statement did not enhance these differences.",
author = "Aldert Vrij and Sharon Leal and Haneen Deeb and Stephanie Chan and Majeed Khader and Chai Xiau‐Ting and Jeffery Chin",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3614",
language = "English",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lying about flying: the efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit

AU - Vrij, Aldert

AU - Leal, Sharon

AU - Deeb, Haneen

AU - Chan, Stephanie

AU - Khader, Majeed

AU - Xiau‐Ting, Chai

AU - Chin, Jeffery

PY - 2019/11/6

Y1 - 2019/11/6

N2 - Due to time constraints interviews aimed to detect deception in airport settings should be brief and veracity assessments should be made in real time. In two experiments carried out in the departure hall of an international airport, truth tellers were asked to report truthfully their forthcoming trip, whereas liars were asked to lie about the purpose of their trip. In Experiment 1 we examined five verbal cues we thought had potential to discriminate truth tellers from liars in short airport interviews: Elaboration in disclosing information, checkable details, how many people are aware of the trip, complications, and plausibility. In Experiment 2 we attempted to improve the interview protocol by adding a second interview phase in which we introduced an Information Protocol and Model Statement. All five cues differentiated truth tellers from liars in both experiments but the Information Protocol and Model Statement did not enhance these differences.

AB - Due to time constraints interviews aimed to detect deception in airport settings should be brief and veracity assessments should be made in real time. In two experiments carried out in the departure hall of an international airport, truth tellers were asked to report truthfully their forthcoming trip, whereas liars were asked to lie about the purpose of their trip. In Experiment 1 we examined five verbal cues we thought had potential to discriminate truth tellers from liars in short airport interviews: Elaboration in disclosing information, checkable details, how many people are aware of the trip, complications, and plausibility. In Experiment 2 we attempted to improve the interview protocol by adding a second interview phase in which we introduced an Information Protocol and Model Statement. All five cues differentiated truth tellers from liars in both experiments but the Information Protocol and Model Statement did not enhance these differences.

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3614

DO - 10.1002/acp.3614

M3 - Article

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

ER -

ID: 16131946