Skip to content

Maoist hybridity? A comparative analysis of the links between insurgent strategic practice and tactical hybridity in contemporary non-state armed groups

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

While the recent literature on hybrid warfare has focused overwhelmingly on Russia, military tactical hybridity among non-state actors has received less attention, and minimal comparative examination. This is surprising as the range of non-state actors successfully using hybridized irregular-conventional tactics (increasingly symmetrically) against states has grown. Examining this phenomenon comparatively in three divergent cases (Islamic State, Boko Haram, the Houthi Movement), this article tests an often-overlooked argument stating that military hybridity among non-state actors is a result of these groups’ common adoption of a specific form of Maoist-style warfare strategy – emulative insurgency.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0
Pages (from-to)0
JournalStudies in Conflict & Terrorism
Early online date25 Jul 2020
Publication statusEarly online - 25 Jul 2020


  • Final_Manuscript_Maoist_Hybridity_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_the_Links_Between_Insurgent_Strategic_Practice_and_Tactical_Hybridity_in_Contemporary_Non_State_Armed_Groups_SCT_Ed_Stoddard

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism on 25/07/2020, available online:

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 448 KB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 25/01/22

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 21413102