Skip to content

Maoist hybridity? A comparative analysis of the links between insurgent strategic practice and tactical hybridity in contemporary non-state armed groups

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

While the recent literature on hybrid warfare has focused overwhelmingly on Russia, military tactical hybridity among non-state actors has received less attention, and minimal comparative examination. This is surprising as the range of non-state actors successfully using hybridized irregular-conventional tactics (increasingly symmetrically) against states has grown. Examining this phenomenon comparatively in three divergent cases (Islamic State, Boko Haram, the Houthi Movement), this article tests an often-overlooked argument stating that military hybridity among non-state actors is a result of these groups’ common adoption of a specific form of Maoist-style warfare strategy – emulative insurgency.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in Conflict & Terrorism
Publication statusAccepted for publication - 13 Jun 2020

Documents

  • Final_Manuscript_Maoist_Hybridity_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_the_Links_Between_Insurgent_Strategic_Practice_and_Tactical_Hybridity_in_Contemporary_Non_State_Armed_Groups_SCT_Ed_Stoddard

    Rights statement: The embargo end date of 2050 is a temporary measure until we know the publication date. Once we know the publication date the full text of this article will be able to view shortly afterwards.

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 448 KB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 1/01/50

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 21413102