Skip to content
Back to outputs

Meeting infant affect

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Meeting infant affect. / Reddy, Vasu.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 2020-2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Reddy, V 2019, 'Meeting infant affect', Developmental Psychology, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2020-2024. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000773

APA

Reddy, V. (2019). Meeting infant affect. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 2020-2024. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000773

Vancouver

Reddy V. Meeting infant affect. Developmental Psychology. 2019 Sep 1;55(9):2020-2024. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000773

Author

Reddy, Vasu. / Meeting infant affect. In: Developmental Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 55, No. 9. pp. 2020-2024.

Bibtex

@article{fc8128322c7b4639b4388d836d87aa0f,
title = "Meeting infant affect",
abstract = "Emotions remain something of a mystery for most of us even when we accept their centrality to development in general and to infancy in particular. I make two arguments in this paper.One: that the most crucial thing about emotions is that they allow mutuality of engagement with other emotional beings - not only evoking responses, but also provoking further emotions in others. Mutual engagements – sometimes called moments of meeting or encounters with other minds - can be transformational. They allow us to be {\textquoteleft}seen{\textquoteright}, to be {\textquoteleft}known{\textquoteright} by others, and in achieving that, they allow us to be persons. Some key phenomena of emotional encounters in infancy are discussed to illustrate this point. Evidence of such meetings is abundant in our lives and needs a committed focus for study within developmental psychology. Two: that we need to open out the idea of emotions (as well as probe at a micro-level) and the terms affect or affectivity might help encompass a greater breadth. Daniel Stern{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}vitality affects{\textquoteright} and Ben Anderson{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}affective atmospheres{\textquoteright} both cross disciplinary boundaries in contemplating emotional phenomena. It seems crucial for developmental psychology to incorporate such different aspects – neurological, kinematic, situational and socio-political - into discussions of emotional development. ",
keywords = "infancy, affectivity, emotional engagement, moments of meeting, vitality affects, affective atmospheres",
author = "Vasu Reddy",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/dev0000773",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "2020--2024",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meeting infant affect

AU - Reddy, Vasu

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Emotions remain something of a mystery for most of us even when we accept their centrality to development in general and to infancy in particular. I make two arguments in this paper.One: that the most crucial thing about emotions is that they allow mutuality of engagement with other emotional beings - not only evoking responses, but also provoking further emotions in others. Mutual engagements – sometimes called moments of meeting or encounters with other minds - can be transformational. They allow us to be ‘seen’, to be ‘known’ by others, and in achieving that, they allow us to be persons. Some key phenomena of emotional encounters in infancy are discussed to illustrate this point. Evidence of such meetings is abundant in our lives and needs a committed focus for study within developmental psychology. Two: that we need to open out the idea of emotions (as well as probe at a micro-level) and the terms affect or affectivity might help encompass a greater breadth. Daniel Stern’s ‘vitality affects’ and Ben Anderson’s ‘affective atmospheres’ both cross disciplinary boundaries in contemplating emotional phenomena. It seems crucial for developmental psychology to incorporate such different aspects – neurological, kinematic, situational and socio-political - into discussions of emotional development.

AB - Emotions remain something of a mystery for most of us even when we accept their centrality to development in general and to infancy in particular. I make two arguments in this paper.One: that the most crucial thing about emotions is that they allow mutuality of engagement with other emotional beings - not only evoking responses, but also provoking further emotions in others. Mutual engagements – sometimes called moments of meeting or encounters with other minds - can be transformational. They allow us to be ‘seen’, to be ‘known’ by others, and in achieving that, they allow us to be persons. Some key phenomena of emotional encounters in infancy are discussed to illustrate this point. Evidence of such meetings is abundant in our lives and needs a committed focus for study within developmental psychology. Two: that we need to open out the idea of emotions (as well as probe at a micro-level) and the terms affect or affectivity might help encompass a greater breadth. Daniel Stern’s ‘vitality affects’ and Ben Anderson’s ‘affective atmospheres’ both cross disciplinary boundaries in contemplating emotional phenomena. It seems crucial for developmental psychology to incorporate such different aspects – neurological, kinematic, situational and socio-political - into discussions of emotional development.

KW - infancy

KW - affectivity

KW - emotional engagement

KW - moments of meeting

KW - vitality affects

KW - affective atmospheres

UR - https://psycnet.apa.org/PsycARTICLES/journal/dev/onlinefirst

U2 - 10.1037/dev0000773

DO - 10.1037/dev0000773

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 2020

EP - 2024

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 14343977