Skip to content
Back to outputs

Polluting environment, polluting constitution: Is a 'polluted' constitution worse than a polluted environment?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Standard

Polluting environment, polluting constitution : Is a 'polluted' constitution worse than a polluted environment? / Dam, Shubhankar; Tewary, Vivek.

In: Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.11.2005, p. 383-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Dam, Shubhankar ; Tewary, Vivek. / Polluting environment, polluting constitution : Is a 'polluted' constitution worse than a polluted environment?. In: Journal of Environmental Law. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 383-393.

Bibtex

@article{6a1682fbd00e41c584a1babfe281fc36,
title = "Polluting environment, polluting constitution: Is a 'polluted' constitution worse than a polluted environment?",
abstract = "The Indian Supreme Court has been praised as one of the most socially active courts in the world, especially so in the environmental field. Yet it is arguable that many of the benefits claimed for judicial involvement are far from real. Three phases of activism are identified. In the 1970s, the Court developed the concept of environmental rights based on ensuring that the directive principles of state policy and the fundamental right to life contained the Constitution worked in mutual support. This was followed by a period when the Court extended liability principles. The most recent and most controversial phase has involved the Court increasingly acting in an executive function and effectively both making and implementing policies. The Court's enthusiasm in environmental matters has now dented India's institutional balance. By being prepared to judicialise all problems of life into problems of law, the Court has undermined the strength of citizens to engage collectively with institutions of the State - the Court should now withdraw from its self-imposed alchemist role.",
author = "Shubhankar Dam and Vivek Tewary",
year = "2005",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jel/eqi029",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "383--393",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
issn = "0952-8873",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Polluting environment, polluting constitution

T2 - Is a 'polluted' constitution worse than a polluted environment?

AU - Dam, Shubhankar

AU - Tewary, Vivek

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - The Indian Supreme Court has been praised as one of the most socially active courts in the world, especially so in the environmental field. Yet it is arguable that many of the benefits claimed for judicial involvement are far from real. Three phases of activism are identified. In the 1970s, the Court developed the concept of environmental rights based on ensuring that the directive principles of state policy and the fundamental right to life contained the Constitution worked in mutual support. This was followed by a period when the Court extended liability principles. The most recent and most controversial phase has involved the Court increasingly acting in an executive function and effectively both making and implementing policies. The Court's enthusiasm in environmental matters has now dented India's institutional balance. By being prepared to judicialise all problems of life into problems of law, the Court has undermined the strength of citizens to engage collectively with institutions of the State - the Court should now withdraw from its self-imposed alchemist role.

AB - The Indian Supreme Court has been praised as one of the most socially active courts in the world, especially so in the environmental field. Yet it is arguable that many of the benefits claimed for judicial involvement are far from real. Three phases of activism are identified. In the 1970s, the Court developed the concept of environmental rights based on ensuring that the directive principles of state policy and the fundamental right to life contained the Constitution worked in mutual support. This was followed by a period when the Court extended liability principles. The most recent and most controversial phase has involved the Court increasingly acting in an executive function and effectively both making and implementing policies. The Court's enthusiasm in environmental matters has now dented India's institutional balance. By being prepared to judicialise all problems of life into problems of law, the Court has undermined the strength of citizens to engage collectively with institutions of the State - the Court should now withdraw from its self-imposed alchemist role.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30544451685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jel/eqi029

DO - 10.1093/jel/eqi029

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:30544451685

VL - 17

SP - 383

EP - 393

JO - Journal of Environmental Law

JF - Journal of Environmental Law

SN - 0952-8873

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 22894215