Skip to content

Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Recently, researchers have started searching for combinations of verbal cues to deceit and verbal cues to truth. The proportion of complications (complications divided by complications plus common knowledge details plus self-handicapping strategies) is an example of such a combination, as it includes one verbal cue of truth (complications) and two verbal cues of deceit (common knowledge details and self-handicapping strategies). This study examines whether or not complications, common knowledge details, self-handicapping strategies and the proportion of complications can differentiate truth-tellers from liars in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews. Both interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews take place frequently, and it is important to know whether or not any given lie detection tool works in both interview settings. For this purpose, three data sets were obtained and the data were aggregated. All four variables were found to differentiate truth-tellers from liars to a similar extent in both interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-164
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Early online date18 Feb 2020
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2020


  • Proportion of complications

    Rights statement: This is an original manuscript / preprint of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychiatry, Psychology and Law on 18/02/2020, available online:

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 252 KB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 18/02/21

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 19110683