Skip to content
Back to outputs

Redefining the impact assessment of buildings: an uncertainty-based approach to rating codes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Redefining the impact assessment of buildings: an uncertainty-based approach to rating codes. / Caputo, Silvio; Gaterell, Mark.

In: Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 36, No. 4, 04.07.2018, p. 348-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Caputo, Silvio ; Gaterell, Mark. / Redefining the impact assessment of buildings: an uncertainty-based approach to rating codes. In: Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2018 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 348-357.

Bibtex

@article{9a236de38a464dc18f30bb119e3da781,
title = "Redefining the impact assessment of buildings: an uncertainty-based approach to rating codes",
abstract = "Discrepancies between predicted and in-use building performance are well documented in impact assessments for buildings such as rating codes. This is a consequence of uncertainties that undermine predictions, which include procedural errors as well as users{\textquoteright} behaviour and technological change. Debate on impact assessment for buildings predominantly focuses on operational issues and does not question the deterministic model on which assessments are based as a potential, underlying cause of ineffectiveness. This article builds on a non-deterministic urban planning theory and the principles it outlines, which can help manage uncertain factors over time. A rating code model is proposed that merges its typical steps of assessment (i.e. classification, characterisation and valuation) with those principles, applied within the impact assessment of buildings. These are experimentation (of other criteria than those typically appraised), exploration (the process of identifying the long-term vulnerability of such criteria) and inquiry (iterating and critically evaluating the assessment over time).",
keywords = "impact assessment of buildings, rating codes, uncertainty, uncertainty-based planning",
author = "Silvio Caputo and Mark Gaterell",
note = "12 months embargo",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14615517.2018.1473138",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "348--357",
journal = "Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal",
issn = "1461-5517",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redefining the impact assessment of buildings: an uncertainty-based approach to rating codes

AU - Caputo, Silvio

AU - Gaterell, Mark

N1 - 12 months embargo

PY - 2018/7/4

Y1 - 2018/7/4

N2 - Discrepancies between predicted and in-use building performance are well documented in impact assessments for buildings such as rating codes. This is a consequence of uncertainties that undermine predictions, which include procedural errors as well as users’ behaviour and technological change. Debate on impact assessment for buildings predominantly focuses on operational issues and does not question the deterministic model on which assessments are based as a potential, underlying cause of ineffectiveness. This article builds on a non-deterministic urban planning theory and the principles it outlines, which can help manage uncertain factors over time. A rating code model is proposed that merges its typical steps of assessment (i.e. classification, characterisation and valuation) with those principles, applied within the impact assessment of buildings. These are experimentation (of other criteria than those typically appraised), exploration (the process of identifying the long-term vulnerability of such criteria) and inquiry (iterating and critically evaluating the assessment over time).

AB - Discrepancies between predicted and in-use building performance are well documented in impact assessments for buildings such as rating codes. This is a consequence of uncertainties that undermine predictions, which include procedural errors as well as users’ behaviour and technological change. Debate on impact assessment for buildings predominantly focuses on operational issues and does not question the deterministic model on which assessments are based as a potential, underlying cause of ineffectiveness. This article builds on a non-deterministic urban planning theory and the principles it outlines, which can help manage uncertain factors over time. A rating code model is proposed that merges its typical steps of assessment (i.e. classification, characterisation and valuation) with those principles, applied within the impact assessment of buildings. These are experimentation (of other criteria than those typically appraised), exploration (the process of identifying the long-term vulnerability of such criteria) and inquiry (iterating and critically evaluating the assessment over time).

KW - impact assessment of buildings

KW - rating codes

KW - uncertainty

KW - uncertainty-based planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047238590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14615517.2018.1473138

DO - 10.1080/14615517.2018.1473138

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 348

EP - 357

JO - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

JF - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

SN - 1461-5517

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 10332500