Skip to content

Regulatory inspection and the changing legitimacy of health and safety

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

The regulation of conduct via law is a key mechanism through which broader social meanings are negotiated and expressed. The use of regulatory tools to bring about desired outcomes reflects existing social and political understandings about¬ institutional legitimacy, the meanings attached to regulation, and the values it seeks to advance. But these contextual understandings are not static, and their evolution poses challenges for regulators, particularly when they reflect political framing processes. This paper shows how inspection has been reshaped as a tool within the United Kingdom’s health and safety system by changes in the meanings attached to the concept of ‘risk-based regulation’. While rates of inspection have fallen dramatically in recent years, the nature and quality of inspection have also been fundamentally reshaped via an increasingly procedural and economically-rational ‘risk-based’ policy context. This has had consequences for the transformative and symbolic value of inspection as a tool of regulatory practice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRegulation & Governance
Early online date8 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 8 Aug 2017

Documents

  • Regulatory inspection and the changing legitimacy of health and safety

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Almond, P., and Esbester, M., (2017) 'Regulatory inspection and the changing legitimacy of health and safety,' Regulation & Governance which has been published in final form at doi: 10.1111/rego.12155. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 439 KB, PDF document

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 7150919