Skip to content
Back to outputs

Residents’ perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue-green infrastructure in housing developments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Residents’ perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue-green infrastructure in housing developments. / Williams, John; Jose, Roshni; Moobela, Cletus; Hutchinson, David; Wise, Richard; Gaterell, Mark.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 190, 103610, 10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{31e0ef788e14406aa6bbdbda10448a9e,
title = "Residents{\textquoteright} perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue-green infrastructure in housing developments",
abstract = "Blue-green infrastructure for storm water management in the UK is considered to be part of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). Design guidance recommends that source control and treatment trains are embedded within developments. This means that residents live next to SuDS performing functions such as infiltration, conveyance and storage. In addition to hydraulic attenuation, SuDS can provide benefits such as water quality improvement, wildlife habitat and amenity. However, economic pressure to maximise development opportunity means that designs do not always maximise these benefits. Therefore, residents{\textquoteright} perceptions of the benefits and problems of living with SuDS are important as these may affect residential property values and willingness to pay management fees, which could justify high quality designs that deliver multiple benefits. This study aimed to investigate these issues through a survey of residents living with SuDS across six housing developments in England, 406/2916 responses were collected. The developments had good quality SuDS, with an established residential population and active housing market. The residents had varied levels of awareness of the presence and function of SuDS. Generally, residents liked the wildlife and green space but this was tempered with concerns over pests (rats and mosquitoes) and litter. Maintenance of SuDS was also an issue and at three sites residents were charged management fees which were not well understood and caused concern. The majority of residents were unwilling to contribute more to maintenance. Most residents and local estate agents did not perceive that SuDS increased property values. Raising awareness of the benefits of SuDS may lead to greater acceptance by residents and encourage developers to include them in developments, which could contribute to overcoming one of the barriers to wider implementation.",
keywords = "RCUK, NERC, NE/N017307/1, APC-PAID",
author = "John Williams and Roshni Jose and Cletus Moobela and David Hutchinson and Richard Wise and Mark Gaterell",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103610",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residents’ perceptions of sustainable drainage systems as highly functional blue-green infrastructure in housing developments

AU - Williams, John

AU - Jose, Roshni

AU - Moobela, Cletus

AU - Hutchinson, David

AU - Wise, Richard

AU - Gaterell, Mark

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Blue-green infrastructure for storm water management in the UK is considered to be part of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). Design guidance recommends that source control and treatment trains are embedded within developments. This means that residents live next to SuDS performing functions such as infiltration, conveyance and storage. In addition to hydraulic attenuation, SuDS can provide benefits such as water quality improvement, wildlife habitat and amenity. However, economic pressure to maximise development opportunity means that designs do not always maximise these benefits. Therefore, residents’ perceptions of the benefits and problems of living with SuDS are important as these may affect residential property values and willingness to pay management fees, which could justify high quality designs that deliver multiple benefits. This study aimed to investigate these issues through a survey of residents living with SuDS across six housing developments in England, 406/2916 responses were collected. The developments had good quality SuDS, with an established residential population and active housing market. The residents had varied levels of awareness of the presence and function of SuDS. Generally, residents liked the wildlife and green space but this was tempered with concerns over pests (rats and mosquitoes) and litter. Maintenance of SuDS was also an issue and at three sites residents were charged management fees which were not well understood and caused concern. The majority of residents were unwilling to contribute more to maintenance. Most residents and local estate agents did not perceive that SuDS increased property values. Raising awareness of the benefits of SuDS may lead to greater acceptance by residents and encourage developers to include them in developments, which could contribute to overcoming one of the barriers to wider implementation.

AB - Blue-green infrastructure for storm water management in the UK is considered to be part of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). Design guidance recommends that source control and treatment trains are embedded within developments. This means that residents live next to SuDS performing functions such as infiltration, conveyance and storage. In addition to hydraulic attenuation, SuDS can provide benefits such as water quality improvement, wildlife habitat and amenity. However, economic pressure to maximise development opportunity means that designs do not always maximise these benefits. Therefore, residents’ perceptions of the benefits and problems of living with SuDS are important as these may affect residential property values and willingness to pay management fees, which could justify high quality designs that deliver multiple benefits. This study aimed to investigate these issues through a survey of residents living with SuDS across six housing developments in England, 406/2916 responses were collected. The developments had good quality SuDS, with an established residential population and active housing market. The residents had varied levels of awareness of the presence and function of SuDS. Generally, residents liked the wildlife and green space but this was tempered with concerns over pests (rats and mosquitoes) and litter. Maintenance of SuDS was also an issue and at three sites residents were charged management fees which were not well understood and caused concern. The majority of residents were unwilling to contribute more to maintenance. Most residents and local estate agents did not perceive that SuDS increased property values. Raising awareness of the benefits of SuDS may lead to greater acceptance by residents and encourage developers to include them in developments, which could contribute to overcoming one of the barriers to wider implementation.

KW - RCUK

KW - NERC

KW - NE/N017307/1

KW - APC-PAID

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103610

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103610

M3 - Article

VL - 190

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

M1 - 103610

ER -

ID: 14692022