Skip to content

Reversing the telescope: evaluating NGO peer regulation initiatives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

This article investigates perceptions of the extent to which non-governmental organization (NGO) peer regulation initiatives have been effective in enhancing accountability in the humanitarian sector. It is based upon semi-structured interviews with individuals with responsibility for accountability policy from leading NGOs and focuses on two of the best-known initiatives: Humanitarian Accountability Partnership and Sphere. It finds that the initiatives have prompted positive changes in practice, but there are significant concerns about their deleterious impacts. Participants describe a host of challenges, including the tendency of peer regulation to become excessively bureaucratic and labour intensive. They cast some doubt on the potential of the initiatives to assist NGOs to be more accountable to affected communities. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-56
JournalJournal of International Development
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jan 2016

Documents

  • Crack 2014_Reversing the Telescope_Journal of International Development

    Rights statement: This is the accepted version of the following article: Reversing the telescope: evaluating NGO peer regulation initiatives, Crack, A. 1 Jun 2014 In : Journal of International Development., which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.3010/abstract

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 523 KB, PDF-document

    Licence: CC BY-SA

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 1441385