Skip to content

Selecting a robust decision making method to evaluate employee performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

This paper investigates how to select a robust decision making method to evaluate employee performance. Two Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are considered for the evaluation of U.S. Coast Guard officers. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to understand the nature of uncertainty in evaluation criteria and employee performance. Outcomes from this analysis provide an understanding of the most critical factors governing the evaluation. MCDM methods dealing with discrete sets of alternatives are considered. The stability of two MCDM methods’ outcomes are compared and the method with the most stable outcome is recommended. The minimum percentage change in criteria weights and performance scores required to alter the outcome of the evaluation is calculated. A MCDM method is recommended based on a best compromise in minimum percentage change required in inputs to alter the outcome of a method.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-351
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Management and Decision Making
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2019

Documents

  • Selecting a robust decision making method

    Rights statement: This is the accepted manuscript for M. Haddad et al. 'Selecting a robust decision making method to evaluate employee performance.' International Journal of Management and Decision Making (IJMDM), Vol. 18, No. 4, 2019. DOI: 10.1504/ijmdm.2019.102646

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 1.07 MB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 14/06/20

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 10889977