Should research ethics committees police reporting bias?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | British Medical Journal (BMJ) |
| Volume | 356 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Mar 2017 |
Links
Related information
Outputs
Research ethics committees/boards should routinely publish primary and secondary outcomes of all ethically approved research
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
Solving the problems of publication and submission bias is an important step, but the focus must now turn to outcome reporting bias
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
A National Clinical Trial Audit System to Improve Clinical Trials Reporting
Research output: Other contribution
Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
ID: 3633155
