Skip to content
Back to outputs

The boundaries of bullying at work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Standard

The boundaries of bullying at work. / Rayner, Charlotte.

2004. Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace, Bergen, Norway.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Harvard

Rayner, C 2004, 'The boundaries of bullying at work', Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace, Bergen, Norway, 28/06/04 - 29/06/04. <https://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/2383/Proceedings_BBRG_2004.pdf?sequence=1>

APA

Rayner, C. (2004). The boundaries of bullying at work. Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace, Bergen, Norway. https://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/2383/Proceedings_BBRG_2004.pdf?sequence=1

Vancouver

Rayner C. The boundaries of bullying at work. 2004. Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace, Bergen, Norway.

Author

Rayner, Charlotte. / The boundaries of bullying at work. Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace, Bergen, Norway.

Bibtex

@conference{d7784adbe3e745f0afa067a1cb2a2264,
title = "The boundaries of bullying at work",
abstract = "Bullying at work has been studied as a discreet concept for over a decade. Throughout this period, those engaged in the field have been conscious of the boundaries of 'bullying' with other highly related areas such as sexual and racial harassment. In acknowledging these types of boundaries, authors have been sensitive to the level of overlap between bullying and the other form of harassment. This has led to the preservation of discreet domains of harassment (e.g. racial, sexual, disability) as areas of study. However research has shown a blurring of general psychological harassment (bullying) at work and these discreet areas. Earnshaw and Cooper (2001) found that UK lawyers reported 'bullying' as the real underlying problem in many legal cases that were ostensibly brought on sexual or racial grounds – possibly as there is no law against bullying specifically in the UK. As a result consideration has been given as to whether bullying should be the overarching concept under which racism and sexism (for example) sit, or indeed whether these concepts should be examined on their own (Rayner, Hoel & Cooper, 2002). Thus contention exists over the topic boundaries of bullying at work. The author considers these 'territorial' discussions potentially distracting, preferring to see one larger whole rather than many smaller isolated elements.",
author = "Charlotte Rayner",
year = "2004",
month = jun,
language = "English",
note = "The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace ; Conference date: 28-06-2004 Through 29-06-2004",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - The boundaries of bullying at work

AU - Rayner, Charlotte

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Bullying at work has been studied as a discreet concept for over a decade. Throughout this period, those engaged in the field have been conscious of the boundaries of 'bullying' with other highly related areas such as sexual and racial harassment. In acknowledging these types of boundaries, authors have been sensitive to the level of overlap between bullying and the other form of harassment. This has led to the preservation of discreet domains of harassment (e.g. racial, sexual, disability) as areas of study. However research has shown a blurring of general psychological harassment (bullying) at work and these discreet areas. Earnshaw and Cooper (2001) found that UK lawyers reported 'bullying' as the real underlying problem in many legal cases that were ostensibly brought on sexual or racial grounds – possibly as there is no law against bullying specifically in the UK. As a result consideration has been given as to whether bullying should be the overarching concept under which racism and sexism (for example) sit, or indeed whether these concepts should be examined on their own (Rayner, Hoel & Cooper, 2002). Thus contention exists over the topic boundaries of bullying at work. The author considers these 'territorial' discussions potentially distracting, preferring to see one larger whole rather than many smaller isolated elements.

AB - Bullying at work has been studied as a discreet concept for over a decade. Throughout this period, those engaged in the field have been conscious of the boundaries of 'bullying' with other highly related areas such as sexual and racial harassment. In acknowledging these types of boundaries, authors have been sensitive to the level of overlap between bullying and the other form of harassment. This has led to the preservation of discreet domains of harassment (e.g. racial, sexual, disability) as areas of study. However research has shown a blurring of general psychological harassment (bullying) at work and these discreet areas. Earnshaw and Cooper (2001) found that UK lawyers reported 'bullying' as the real underlying problem in many legal cases that were ostensibly brought on sexual or racial grounds – possibly as there is no law against bullying specifically in the UK. As a result consideration has been given as to whether bullying should be the overarching concept under which racism and sexism (for example) sit, or indeed whether these concepts should be examined on their own (Rayner, Hoel & Cooper, 2002). Thus contention exists over the topic boundaries of bullying at work. The author considers these 'territorial' discussions potentially distracting, preferring to see one larger whole rather than many smaller isolated elements.

M3 - Paper

T2 - The Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace

Y2 - 28 June 2004 through 29 June 2004

ER -

ID: 191519