Skip to content
Back to outputs

The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - a strategic conduct analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - a strategic conduct analysis. / Warren, Liz; Jack, Lisa.

In: The British Accounting Review, 19.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{1c0f3b4e77dd4f25aeca1d1c6e64a0dc,
title = "The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - a strategic conduct analysis",
abstract = "Using structuration theory, this paper examines capital budgeting and its role in the {\textquoteleft}energy trilemma{\textquoteright}. The key focus is on the role of knowledgeable agency inffq s. the analysis of strategic conduct. In particular, demonstrating how accounting tools can be used by executive managers, who whilst dominant in their own organisations, are themselves subordinate to the government in the United Kingdom and at the European level. The strategic conduct of actors is examined in a narrative, theorised case study setting, which spans across 11 years, 2006- 2017. The principal contribution to knowledge from this study is the extent to which strategic investment accounting played in changing regulatory and government policy and spending requirements in a privatised industry. The most dominant party, the government and regulators, were forced to take the generators{\textquoteright} concerns seriously, because the generators (based on knowledge derived from capital budgets) restricted their capital expenditure rather than mobilising their resources. The need for resources to reduce emissions provided an opportunity for the industry to force the government to consider the problem of energy. The generators highlighted that this was not only a problem of price for consumers and environmental sustainability, but as one of long term supply. The generators argued that government had to address all aspects of the trilemma when creating policy.",
keywords = "capital budgeting, investment appraisal, uncertainty, environmental regulation, Large Combustion Plant Directive, knowledgeable agency, strategic conduct, embargoover12",
author = "Liz Warren and Lisa Jack",
note = "Embargo 24 mths ",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2018.04.005",
language = "English",
journal = "The British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma - a strategic conduct analysis

AU - Warren, Liz

AU - Jack, Lisa

N1 - Embargo 24 mths

PY - 2018/6/19

Y1 - 2018/6/19

N2 - Using structuration theory, this paper examines capital budgeting and its role in the ‘energy trilemma’. The key focus is on the role of knowledgeable agency inffq s. the analysis of strategic conduct. In particular, demonstrating how accounting tools can be used by executive managers, who whilst dominant in their own organisations, are themselves subordinate to the government in the United Kingdom and at the European level. The strategic conduct of actors is examined in a narrative, theorised case study setting, which spans across 11 years, 2006- 2017. The principal contribution to knowledge from this study is the extent to which strategic investment accounting played in changing regulatory and government policy and spending requirements in a privatised industry. The most dominant party, the government and regulators, were forced to take the generators’ concerns seriously, because the generators (based on knowledge derived from capital budgets) restricted their capital expenditure rather than mobilising their resources. The need for resources to reduce emissions provided an opportunity for the industry to force the government to consider the problem of energy. The generators highlighted that this was not only a problem of price for consumers and environmental sustainability, but as one of long term supply. The generators argued that government had to address all aspects of the trilemma when creating policy.

AB - Using structuration theory, this paper examines capital budgeting and its role in the ‘energy trilemma’. The key focus is on the role of knowledgeable agency inffq s. the analysis of strategic conduct. In particular, demonstrating how accounting tools can be used by executive managers, who whilst dominant in their own organisations, are themselves subordinate to the government in the United Kingdom and at the European level. The strategic conduct of actors is examined in a narrative, theorised case study setting, which spans across 11 years, 2006- 2017. The principal contribution to knowledge from this study is the extent to which strategic investment accounting played in changing regulatory and government policy and spending requirements in a privatised industry. The most dominant party, the government and regulators, were forced to take the generators’ concerns seriously, because the generators (based on knowledge derived from capital budgets) restricted their capital expenditure rather than mobilising their resources. The need for resources to reduce emissions provided an opportunity for the industry to force the government to consider the problem of energy. The generators highlighted that this was not only a problem of price for consumers and environmental sustainability, but as one of long term supply. The generators argued that government had to address all aspects of the trilemma when creating policy.

KW - capital budgeting

KW - investment appraisal

KW - uncertainty

KW - environmental regulation

KW - Large Combustion Plant Directive

KW - knowledgeable agency

KW - strategic conduct

KW - embargoover12

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2018.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2018.04.005

M3 - Article

JO - The British Accounting Review

JF - The British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

ER -

ID: 10601810