Skip to content

The curious under‐representation of women impact case leaders: can we disengender inequality regimes?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Universities are increasingly expected to demonstrate the wider societal impacts of academic research. Yet women management scholars were disproportionately under‐represented in leading impact cases in the UK's REF (Research Excellence Framework) 2014. An analysis of 395 REF impact cases for business and management studies with an identifiable lead author revealed that only 25 per cent were led by women, of which 54 per cent were sole authored. Based on 12 in‐depth interviews with women impact case writers, we use Acker's inequality regimes framework to understand invisible and socially constructed gendering of the UK's policy that is designed to evaluate research impact. In a knowledge‐intensive workplace dominated by men, the shape and degree of gendered bases of inequality, systemic practices, processes and controls result in sub‐optimal talent management and gendered knowledge. We call for university leaders to be proactive in addressing barriers that fail to support or recognize women's leadership of research impact.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalGender, Work and Organization
Early online date31 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 31 Jul 2019

Documents

  • YARROW_2019_cright_GWO_The curious under‐representation of women impact case leaders

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Davies, J, Yarrow, E, Syed, J. 'The curious under‐representation of women impact case leaders: Can we disengender inequality regimes?' Gender, Work and Organization, 2019, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12409. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 647 KB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 30/07/21

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 15650145