Skip to content

Towards a posthumanist institutional ethnography: viscous matterings and gendered bodies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

This article makes the case for Posthumanist Institutional Ethnography (PIE). In doing so, it builds on and diverges from Dorothy E. Smith’s post-structural work on Institutional Ethnography (IE), and speaks into recent discussions on the contested nature of ethnography. Drawing on the work of Donna Haraway, Karen Barad and Jane Bennet, and on empirical data from two recent projects, the article argues that PIE, in contesting human exceptionalism, places the human in relation to other-than-human objects, bodies and materialities, and thereby radically recasts ontology, epistemology, and ethics. Six features of PIE are identified. These features are put to work via an analysis of material moments which illuminate how gendered inequalities are produced, enacted and materialised in complex institutional ecologies. The article’s theoretical and methodological contributions provide new insights into the fluid, ephemeral and affective materialisation of gendered politics in institutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-527
Number of pages19
JournalEthnography and Education
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date5 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Documents

  • Towards a posthumanist institutional ethnography

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Ethnography and Education on 05/03/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17457823.2020.1735469.

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 428 KB, PDF document

    Due to publisher’s copyright restrictions, this document is not freely available to download from this website until: 5/09/21

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 18907260