Skip to content

Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

We propose an interactive multiobjective evolutionary algorithm that attempts to discover the most preferred part of the Pareto-optimal set. Preference information is elicited by asking the user to compare some solutions pairwise. This information is then used to curb the set of compatible user’s value functions, and the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm is run to simultaneously search for all solutions that could potentially be the most preferred. Compared to previous similar approaches, we implement a much more efficient way of determining potentially preferred solutions, that is, solutions that are best for at least one value function compatible with the preference information provided by the decision maker. For the first time in the context of evolutionary computation, we apply the Choquet integral as a user’s preference model, allowing us to capture interactions between objectives. As there is a trade-off between the flexibility of the value function model and the complexity of learning a faithful model of user’s preferences, we propose to start the interactive process with a simple linear model but then to switch to the Choquet integral as soon as the preference information can no longer be represented using the linear model. An experimental analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)884-901
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Issue number3
Early online date26 Oct 2015
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016


  • GRECO_2016_cright_EJOR_Using_Choquet_Integral_as_Preference_Model_in_Interactive_Evolutionary

    Rights statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Journal of Operational Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), (May 2016), DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.027

    Accepted author manuscript (Post-print), 2.23 MB, PDF document

Related information

Relations Get citation (various referencing formats)

ID: 3350416